Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Nanonox's latest activity
Nanonox
replied to the thread
General
Updated cube vocabulary
.
I was hoping someone would! In the context of the definitions I mentioned: - Become Immense : GY payoff and power matters enabler. -...
Aug 11, 2026
Nanonox
reacted to
water the weeds's post
in the thread
General
Updated cube vocabulary
with
Like
.
I'm going to propose yet another way to think about card roles in supporting synergy. Narrow/Broad which measures versatility, and then...
Aug 11, 2026
Nanonox
reacted to
MilesOfficial's post
in the thread
Card/Deck
Single Card Spotlight
with
Like
.
One of the many Alchemy cards that plays extremely well online but would be rough to do in paper. Drafting from a spellbook in paper in...
Aug 10, 2026
Nanonox
reacted to
Mown's post
in the thread
General
Updated cube vocabulary
with
Like
.
I'm going to challenge these concepts a little (because of course I am). First of all, there's the sentiment that enablers are...
Aug 10, 2026
Nanonox
replied to the thread
General
Updated cube vocabulary
.
That's exactly right. It feels wrong to have Jeskai Ascendancy not be classified as an engine because that's how I tend to think about...
Aug 10, 2026
Nanonox
reacted to
Nemo's post
in the thread
General
[HOB/HOC] The Hobbit (Eternal) Testing/Includes
with
Like
.
Does anybody else kind of like the colorless utility cards at all for a lower powered cube? I can picture a player who stretches into an...
Aug 10, 2026
Nanonox
reacted to
Karshtakavaar's post
in the thread
Nanonox's 1vs1 cube
with
Like
.
I'm a massive proponent of Fatestitcher, especially with High Tide or twiddlestorm-adjacent cards around, so I'm hoping the following...
Aug 10, 2026
Nanonox
reacted to
Karshtakavaar's post
in the thread
General
Updated cube vocabulary
with
Like
.
Love the redefinitions of engine and bridge - It feels like "Engine" has been broadening in definition for as long as I've been playing...
Aug 10, 2026
Nanonox
reacted to
Karshtakavaar's post
in the thread
General
Fight Club
with
Like
.
I've gotta second everything Erik Twice said here. Gingerbrute plays better than it looks, and it looks great. Bomat is so, so good at...
Aug 10, 2026
Nanonox
reacted to
Brad's post
in the thread
Card/Deck
Broken cards for lower power
with
Like
.
Can lead to bad games, so I don't like it, but it's a fine card.
Aug 10, 2026
Nanonox
reacted to
Karshtakavaar's post
in the thread
RED DECK: WINS!!
with
Like
.
Goggles was on the shortlist for Storm for a lil bit, but got cut early as I assumed it would be too narrow - never even considered it...
Aug 10, 2026
Nanonox
posted the thread
General
Updated cube vocabulary
in
Cube Talk
.
Having more time to think cube during the summer, I wanted to run by you fine folks an attempt at updating cube vocabulary. In my...
Aug 9, 2026
Nanonox
reacted to
Schafkurai's post
in the thread
Card/Deck
Single Card Spotlight
with
Like
.
So, I've been playing the latest iteration of the Planar Cube on Arena for a few drafts and a card that I really like (and probably has...
Aug 9, 2026
Nanonox
replied to the thread
RED DECK: WINS!!
.
That looks like a really fun challenge, building something so small and archetype dense. I love your Cathodion welder target and it...
Aug 8, 2026
Nanonox
reacted to
Karshtakavaar's post
in the thread
RED DECK: WINS!!
with
Like
.
Final Thoughts Well, 34 lands and 34 creatures was a pipe dream, but with all the rocks, rituals, dorks and burn running about 32 and...
Aug 8, 2026
Members
Top