General CBS

Neat that they introduced a voucher option that'll be viable for most people, unfortunately my system having extra steps makes it a little tougher to implement 1-to-1 on Cobra. For traditional vouchers/squadron picks it's going to work very well just giving you the copies of whatever card(s) you need, but mine has the caveat of limitations to cashing in once per card and having to draft the actual copy of the card.

I'll probably just have to continue including the voucher options in the land box for a drafter to manually add to their Cobra decks online.

All that said, this is a pretty handy tool with some neat possibilities. I ran it for 300 in the background while working on stuff and it came out with some cool outputs:

cubecobra_cluster_1.png

Expected color distributions here, nothing out of the ordinary with the base breakdown.

cubecobra_cluster_2.png

26 clusters in my 450 sounds about right, I'm liking the criss-crossing overlap showing the ability to bleed between archetypes. I'm assuming that running for more simulations will leader to more dense clusters like @Erik Twice got with 500. Maybe I'll just go with 1000 or something at the beginning of work next week and see what happens by the end of it.

cubecobra_cluster_3.png

I like the visualization of these clusters with staples and other stats, really cool feature to nerd out over for hours at a time. The bots definitely have their limitations overall, but this looks way better than previous bot logic applied in single drafts. It identified just about every major archetype I've built over the years or covered in my cube primer.
 
Screenshot 2026-05-23 at 16.06.53.pngScreenshot 2026-05-23 at 15.42.44.png
38 clusters found after 400 drafts

Many of these are repeated, which, after looking into the decks, sometimes makes sense and sometimes doesn't. The two "W Weenie" clusters, for example, roughly refer to two distinct groups of cards, a tokens build and an artifact aggro build. Yet, the two "WG midrange" decks have essentially the same staple cards...

Some of the themes that bridge certain colors are not represented, even though they are not an issue to draft in the cube, such as the White-Black Constellation/Saga Control deck. I think the nuances of this deck and these colors might too fine-grained for the CubeCobra bots, with options ranging/blending between Liliana's Contract/Changeling combo, Demonic Pact Blink, low-power-matters reanimator (Shirei, Shizo's Caretaker, Vesperlark, Triskelion) and so on.

Green and Red turned to be the least drafted combination, and the strange assortment of cards chosen by the bots reflect the variety of decks which might be drafted in these colors but which are, nevertheless, not always overlapping: tappers/untappers, land storm, madness, power-matters, etc.

Something I didn't expect, Dimension X Pizzasaur was the second highest picked card, being taken P1P1 98% of the time.
 
I played around a bit with my old cube and my WIP cube. Tried 100, 300 and 1000 drafts. At 1000 there are ton of extraneous data, like 4 same WR weenie archetypes. Also, bots obviously can't figure more niche archetypes. They figured out enchantments as WG midrange, but completely ignored BG and BW enchantments.

While I get that you can take lessons from how things connect on the map, I struggle to imagine how exactly to analyze the data to learn something actually useful. I'd be interested if someone more knowledgeable can point out what's valuable except obvious toy factor.
 
It's a cute tool, but it relies on a relative degree of normalcy. It can draft a storm deck in my cube and it looks quite competent, because it knows that Lion's Eye Diamond and Yawgmoth's Will often appear together in the same decks. On the other hand, it doesn't have the knowledge base to think about drafting Stoneforge Mystic and Trinket Mage to fetch Giantcraft Helm that buffs Disruptor of Currents and Ethereal Forager. To the contrary, the "exemplary" WB weenie deck plays a Stoneforge with no targets; the tool is more keen to pair the card with Ranger-Captain of Eos than Pre-War Formalwear (although they are both strongly associated). Ultimately, the bots are really good at building uninspired and boring decks that miss the point of the cube, so I struggle to see what utility I would get out of it. If I had a ton of drafts of my cube and ran it on only that data then you could maybe draw some fun conclusions.

It also picks the three SOS cards I just added 100% of the time with seemingly no context, so you get fun things like white weenies splashing Tragedy Feaster off 0 black sources.
 
I did try with 2500 draftrs, but it doesn't lead to better data since it runs into limitations with duplication and clustering. The data is pretty much identical to 500, it's just repeated more times. It's also hard to adjust it to a reasonable level.

If sorting by colour, rather than just clusters, I think one can easily see the problem with green in my cube. Green is to the left, very heavily clustered around the lands archetype. It has UG ramp below and BG midrange on top, but little WG and, most importantly, no GR.

This makes sense since WG, UG and GR are historically weak guilds with little support and lack of powerful interaction or archetypes.

1779523628843.png
 
While I get that you can take lessons from how things connect on the map, I struggle to imagine how exactly to analyze the data to learn something actually useful.
Whether it's correct or not, I am treating the data as a way to show the more obvious archetypes that a cube contains. Another leap of dubious logic and now I'm equating that to what a newer player would find signals for.

I'll be posting more in my blog, but for example my lands/ramp cluster doesn't really communicate with the storm one, even though they should go well together. So as a more obvious signal, I am thinking of adding Sail into the West, a card I've considered before, but not as an explicit signpost to go into Simic combo.
 
I'd be interested if someone more knowledgeable can point out what's valuable except obvious toy factor.

As someone who interpreted somewhat more UMAP/clustered spatialized data plots than the average bear (though never made them), here are my two cents on what these are good for.

--Identifying new clusters you may have missed (i.e. all intended decks are considered "draftable" from historic human draft data).

--Make sure that all the clusters you think are there are there and that they have roughly the right number of members per cluster (i.e. color combination balance).




Then, once you've moved on from there, ask card-by-card questions.

--Ensure that cards are where you think they will be. (Want Goblin Bombardment to support Aristocrats? Make sure it's not in your Izzet Spellslinger pile)

--Identify cards that may be specific or nonspecific to archetypes. (Bone Shards getting in your UB Control? Yikes. Do you have LOTS of nonspecific cards? Maybe there's too much good stuff.)


In a nutshell, these are sniff tests--are the cards where you expect them to be? These are necessarily data reductions, though, so you're losing a lot of nuance (as we've already figured out in this thread).



A note on cluster annotations:
I don't know how much you can actually count on the bots knowing what they are doing. After a draft I checked what the bots have been drafting and they've named a slightly weird black grindy sacrifice deck: Black Tempo. Maybe they don't really know what they are doing actually.
The bots absolutely, 100% do not know what they're doing, in the sense that I would completely disregard the name, but I think this is still valuable. It strongly suggests that these cards have a track record of working together (or at least that humans draft these cards together), though it doesn't know how these cards work together or why. Has anyone drafted a deck like this? If not, might be interesting to force it a few times!

From reading the documentation, it sounds like Gwen & co. manually set out a pool of cards for each cluster label. If you see something that doesn't make sense, it's likely because you've done something way off the beaten path and the computer grabbed the nearest label out of desperation. In which case, congrats! I want to see those decks.
 
I feel very stupid, but... I tried using it, many times, on many cubes, and it always gives me 800 different clusters, each one with exactly one deck. I am not sure about what I am doing wrong...
 
I feel very stupid, but... I tried using it, many times, on many cubes, and it always gives me 800 different clusters, each one with exactly one deck. I am not sure about what I am doing wrong...
This sounds like a fascinating problem! Would you mind sharing a screenshot of your settings? Idk if any of us will be able to diagnose the issue, but it sure sounds interesting.
 
Okay, so, I tried for the Cube they used at the 2007 Invitational: https://cubecobra.com/cube/list/invi07-og?view=Mainboard (so that I am sure the problem is not that my Cubes are so badly done that even cubecobra refuses to touch them)

jKaz4No.png


I haven't change anything in the settings, everything very normal

5h37tqX.png


All 800 drafted decks belong to a cluster that consists of just them, and all these clusters are overlapping in the map. Also, the name of each cluster is (colour of the deck) + Big Ramp -- and this is true in any Cube I try:

9rQkaq8.jpeg
 
One more thought on what this cluster map *could* be good for:

This feature isn't included because it would be computationally expensive, but where cluster analysis of UMAP is really really good for is comparisons of a map under similar but distinct conditions. For example, if I added in the aforementioned Goblin Bombardment, what does it do to my clusters? What does it enable, and what does it make less likely to coalesce? Which clusters are more prevalent, and which decrease?

To make this really explicit, if you're thinking of some additions or cuts, implement them, rerun the simulation, then compare the maps they draw.

More later because I'm super tired this week, but I wanted to get this in there in case someone else has the bandwidth to do so. If not I'll probably illustrate this tomorrow.
 
Last edited:
Okay, Clustering 102! This time with slides

This is my cube

1780446666188.png

This is my cube on storm (I added in Brain Freeze, Tendrils of Agony, Time Spiral, Pyretic Ritual, Grapeshot, Lion's Eye Diamond, and Dark Ritual):

1780446795608.png

Notice how they look really different! This is to illustrate LESSON ONE: THAT THE SHAPE OF THE CLUSTERS DOES NOT REPRESENT ANY FUNDAMENTAL TRUTH ABOUT YOUR DATA. They are simply a maximization of a set of parameters.


Okay, let's focus in on the middle of the second image. See how there's a big Y-shaped bit? That's UBR storm!

1780447204818.png


Next to it, we see another, more discard-focused UBR storm cluster!
different ubr storm smaller.PNG

And next to THAT, another UR storm cluster! Gee, looks like storm is in the middle!

ur storm smaller.PNG

Okay, and if we follow UR storm out, we see UR burn--this makes a lot of sense!
ur burn smaller.PNG

Huh, what's that olive group splashed across storm? Maybe UB storm??
wg midrange smaller.PNG
What are you doing here, WG midrange????

:btg:

This is because of LESSON TWO: ADJACENT CLUSTERS ARE OFTEN, BUT NOT ALWAYS, RELATED TO ONE ANOTHER. So be really careful about drawing conclusions from saying that one cluster "bleeds into" on another! This is a very common mistake, and one which people have written a ton of specialized software to resolve, oftentimes by using what is called pseudotime analysis, at least in biology. However, this requires lots and lots of data to do properly, which we won't have.


=======================================

So, that's a lot about what we can't do, but what CAN we deduce from this sort of analysis? Let's go back to the basics I mentioned in my previous post: when I add a minimal storm package, which clusters appear, which disappear, which grow, and which shrink? N.B. that I manually added clusters with similar tags and colors, which is highly subjective but necessary for this type of analysis--see spoiler tag below the table for the unclustered data.

I did some preliminary analysis of this. Here are my findings:

Baseline (% of decks)With Storm (% of decks)Change (% of decks)
2​
DISAPPEAREDBR Midrange -- Humans Soldiers Enchantments
1.3​
DISAPPEAREDBRG Lands Midrange --
1.6​
DISAPPEAREDUGR Lands Midrange -- Wizards Enchantments
3.6​
DISAPPEAREDUR Spellslinger -- Wizards Spells
1.7​
DISAPPEAREDWUB Control -- Spells
8.2​
3.3​
-4.9​
WR Artifact Aggro -- Artifacts Soldiers
5.4​
1.6​
-3.8​
UG Lands Midrange -- Enchantments
8.2​
6.8​
-1.4​
R Aggro -- Goblins Artifacts
10.3​
9.6​
-0.7​
G Lands Soup -- Enchantments
9.2​
8.5​
-0.7​
UB Tempo -- Ninjas Spells
1.3​
0.9​
-0.4​
UBG Value Midrange --
2.4​
2.1​
-0.3​
B Aristocrats -- Zombies Humans
1.4​
1.1​
-0.3​
WU Artifact Control -- Artifacts
6.3​
6.1​
-0.2​
W Weenie -- Soldiers Spirits Enchantments
5.7​
5.5​
-0.2​
BR Aristocrats -- Vampires Humans
2.1​
1.9​
-0.2​
G Midrange -- Enchantments
2.2​
2​
-0.2​
WUG Value -- Wizards Enchantments
3.9​
3.8​
-0.1​
B Tempo -- Zombies
5.4​
5.4​
0​
BG Midrange --
1.1​
1.2​
0.1​
U Artifacts -- Wizards Spells
2.7​
3.2​
0.5​
WU Control -- Wizards Spells
3.4​
4.1​
0.7​
WU Blink -- Spirits Wizards
3.8​
4.5​
0.7​
WB Weenie -- Zombies Knights
1.6​
2.4​
0.8​
WG Midrange -- Soldiers Humans
0.9​
1.7​
0.8​
BR Aristocrats -- Artifacts
6​
7.1​
1.1​
WR Aggro -- Knights Soldiers
2.5​
4.1​
1.6​
UR Burn -- Wizards Artifacts
1​
NEWBG Lands Midrange --
5.2​
NEWUBR Storm -- Spells
5.4​
NEWUG Ramp -- Enchantments
1.6​
NEWUR Storm -- Spells

RawSortedAlignedUn-clumpedClumpedClumps sorted by biggest winners and losers
Total %Total %
100.1​
99.2​
BaselineWith StormBaselineWith StormBaselineWith StormBaselineWith StormChangeBaselineWith StormChangeBaseline (% of decks)With Storm (% of decks)Change (% of decks)
NumberColorsNamePercentTagsNumberColorsNamePercentTagsNumberColorsNamePercentTagsNumberColorsNamePercentTagsNumberColorsNamePercentTagsNumberColorsNamePercentTags
1​
GLands Soup
6.2​
Enchantments
1​
GLands Soup
9.6​
Enchantments
18​
BAristocrats
2.4​
ZombiesHumans
23​
BAristocrats
2.1​
ZombiesHumans
18​
BAristocrats
2.4​
ZombiesHumans
23​
BAristocrats
2.1​
ZombiesHumans
2.4​
2.1​
-0.3​
B Aristocrats -- Zombies Humans
2.4​
2.1​
-0.3​
B Aristocrats -- Zombies Humans
2​
DISAPPEAREDBR Midrange -- Humans Soldiers Enchantments
2​
WRAggro
6​
KnightsSoldiers
2​
WRAggo
7.1​
KnightsSoldiersArtifacts
6​
BTempo
3.9​
ZombiesHumans
6​
BTempo
3.8​
Zombies
1.3​
DISAPPEAREDBRG Lands Midrange --
3​
UGRamp
5.4​
Enchantments
3​
UBTempo
4.8​
NinjasWizards
11​
BGMidrange
3.2​
Zombies
35​
BGLands Midrange
1​
6​
BTempo
3.9​
ZombiesHumans
6​
BTempo
3.8​
Zombies
3.9​
3.8​
-0.1​
B Tempo -- Zombies
3.9​
3.8​
-0.1​
B Tempo -- Zombies
1.6​
DISAPPEAREDUGR Lands Midrange -- Wizards Enchantments
4​
UBTempo
4.8​
NinjasSpells
4​
WBWeenie
4.5​
ZombiesKnights
23​
BGMidrange
2.2​
8​
BGMidrange
3.4​
3.6​
DISAPPEAREDUR Spellslinger -- Wizards Spells
5​
RAggro
3.9​
GoblinsArtifactsHumans
5​
URBurn
4.1​
Wizards
8​
BRAristocrats
3.7​
VampiresWarriors
24​
BGMidrange
2​
Zombies
11​
BGMidrange
3.2​
Zombies
8​
BGMidrange
3.4​
3.2​
3.4​
0.2​
BG Midrange --
5.4​
5.4​
0​
BG Midrange --
1.7​
DISAPPEAREDWUB Control -- Spells
6​
BTempo
3.9​
ZombiesHumans
6​
BTempo
3.8​
Zombies
26​
BRAristocrats
2​
WarriorsVampires
9​
BRAristocrats
3.3​
VampiresHumans
23​
BGMidrange
2.2​
24​
BGMidrange
2​
Zombies
2.2​
2​
-0.2​
BG Midrange -- Zombies
8.2​
3.3​
-4.9​
WR Artifact Aggro -- Artifacts Soldiers
7​
WBWeenie
3.8​
ZombiesKnights
7​
UBTempo
3.7​
NinjasSpells
38​
BRAristocrats
0.9​
Artifacts
19​
BRAristocrats
2.2​
VampiresZombies
5.4​
1.6​
-3.8​
UG Lands Midrange -- Enchantments
8​
BRAristocrats
3.7​
VampiresWarriors
8​
BGMidrange
3.4​
25​
BRMidrange
2​
HumansSoldiersEnchantments
28​
BRAristocrats
1.7​
Artifacts
35​
BGLands Midrange
1​
1​
NEWBG Lands Midrange --
1​
NEWBG Lands Midrange --
8.2​
6.8​
-1.4​
R Aggro -- Goblins Artifacts
9​
URSpellslinger
3.6​
WizardsSpells
9​
BRAristocrats
3.3​
VampiresHumans
33​
BRGLands Midrange
1.3​
1​
GLands Soup
9.6​
Enchantments
10.3​
9.6​
-0.7​
G Lands Soup -- Enchantments
10​
WUBlink
3.4​
SpiritsWizards
10​
WRArtifact Aggro
3.3​
ArtifactsSoldiers
1​
GLands Soup
6.2​
Enchantments
27​
GMidrange
1.9​
Enchantments
8​
BRAristocrats
3.7​
VampiresWarriors
9​
BRAristocrats
3.3​
VampiresHumans
3.7​
3.3​
-0.4​
BR Aristocrats -- Vampires Humans
5.7​
5.5​
-0.2​
BR Aristocrats -- Vampires Humans
9.2​
8.5​
-0.7​
UB Tempo -- Ninjas Spells
11​
BGMidrange
3.2​
Zombies
11​
WUContro
3.2​
WizardsSpells
17​
GLands Soup
2.5​
Enchantments
12​
RAggro
3.2​
GoblinsArtifacts
26​
BRAristocrats
2​
WarriorsVampires
19​
BRAristocrats
2.2​
VampiresZombies
2​
2.2​
0.2​
BR Aristocrats -- Vampires Zombies
1.3​
0.9​
-0.4​
UBG Value Midrange --
12​
WWeenie
3.2​
SpiritsSoldiers
12​
RAggro
3.2​
GoblinsArtifacts
28​
GLands Soup
1.6​
WarriorsEnchantments
15​
RAggro
2.5​
Goblins
38​
BRAristocrats
0.9​
Artifacts
28​
BRAristocrats
1.7​
Artifacts
0.9​
1.7​
0.8​
BR Aristocrats -- Artifacts
0.9​
1.7​
0.8​
BR Aristocrats -- Artifacts
2.4​
2.1​
-0.3​
B Aristocrats -- Zombies Humans
13​
RAggro
3.1​
Goblins
13​
UBRStorm
3.1​
Spells
24​
GMidrange
2.1​
Enchantments
34​
RAggro
1.1​
GoblinsHumans
1.4​
1.1​
-0.3​
WU Artifact Control -- Artifacts
14​
WRArtifact Aggro
2.8​
Artifacts
14​
UGRamp
2.9​
Enchantments
5​
RAggro
3.9​
GoblinsArtifactsHumans
32​
UArtifacts
1.2​
WizardsSpells
25​
BRMidrange
2​
HumansSoldiersEnchantments
2​
DISAPPEAREDBR Midrange -- Humans Soldiers Enchantments
2​
DISAPPEAREDBR Midrange -- Humans Soldiers Enchantments
6.3​
6.1​
-0.2​
W Weenie -- Soldiers Spirits Enchantments
15​
WUControl
2.7​
WizardsSpells
15​
RAggro
2.5​
Goblins
13​
RAggro
3.1​
Goblins
3​
UBTempo
4.8​
NinjasWizards
5.7​
5.5​
-0.2​
BR Aristocrats -- Vampires Humans
16​
URBurn
2.5​
WizardsSpells
16​
UGRamp
2.5​
Enchantments
35​
RWelder
1.2​
Artifacts
7​
UBTempo
3.7​
NinjasSpells
33​
BRGLands Midrange
1.3​
1.3​
DISAPPEAREDBRG Lands Midrange --
1.3​
DISAPPEAREDBRG Lands Midrange --
2.1​
1.9​
-0.2​
G Midrange -- Enchantments
17​
GLands Soup
2.5​
Enchantments
17​
WWeenie
2.4​
SoldiersSpirits
36​
UArtifacts
1.1​
WizardsSpells
36​
UBGValue Midrange
0.9​
2.2​
2​
-0.2​
WUG Value -- Wizards Enchantments
18​
BAristocrats
2.4​
ZombiesHumans
18​
WGMidrange
2.4​
SoldiersHumansEnchantments
4​
UBTempo
4.8​
NinjasSpells
13​
UBRStorm
3.1​
Spells
1​
GLands Soup
6.2​
Enchantments
1​
GLands Soup
9.6​
Enchantments
6.2​
9.6​
3.4​
G Lands Soup -- Enchantments
10.3​
9.6​
-0.7​
G Lands Soup -- Enchantments
3.9​
3.8​
-0.1​
B Tempo -- Zombies
19​
WUGValue
2.2​
WizardsSpellsEnchantments
19​
BRAristocrats
2.2​
VampiresZombies
20​
UBTempo
2.2​
Ninjas
21​
UBRStorm
2.1​
Spells
17​
GLands Soup
2.5​
Enchantments
2.5​
DISAPPEAREDG Lands Soup -- Enchantments
5.4​
5.4​
0​
BG Midrange --
20​
UBTempo
2.2​
Ninjas
20​
WWeenie
2.2​
SoldiersKnights
22​
UBTempo
2.2​
NinjasWizards
30​
UGLands Midrange
1.6​
Enchantments
28​
GLands Soup
1.6​
WarriorsEnchantments
1.6​
DISAPPEAREDG Lands Soup -- Warriors Enchantments
1.1​
1.2​
0.1​
U Artifacts -- Wizards Spells
21​
WWeenie
2.2​
SoldiersKnights
21​
UBRStorm
2.1​
Spells
32​
UBGValue Midrange
1.3​
14​
UGRamp
2.9​
Enchantments
2.7​
3.2​
0.5​
WU Control -- Wizards Spells
22​
UBTempo
2.2​
NinjasWizards
22​
WUBlink
2.1​
SpiritsWizards
3​
UGRamp
5.4​
Enchantments
16​
UGRamp
2.5​
Enchantments
24​
GMidrange
2.1​
Enchantments
27​
GMidrange
1.9​
Enchantments
2.1​
1.9​
-0.2​
G Midrange -- Enchantments
2.1​
1.9​
-0.2​
G Midrange -- Enchantments
3.4​
4.1​
0.7​
WU Blink -- Spirits Wizards
23​
BGMidrange
2.2​
23​
BAristocrats
2.1​
ZombiesHumans
29​
UGRLands Midrange
1.6​
WizardsEnchantments
5​
URBurn
4.1​
Wizards
3.8​
4.5​
0.7​
WB Weenie -- Zombies Knights
24​
GMidrange
2.1​
Enchantments
24​
BGMidrange
2​
Zombies
16​
URBurn
2.5​
WizardsSpells
29​
URStorm
1.6​
Spells
5​
RAggro
3.9​
GoblinsArtifactsHumans
12​
RAggro
3.2​
GoblinsArtifacts
3.9​
3.2​
-0.7​
R Aggro -- Goblins Artifacts
8.2​
6.8​
-1.4​
R Aggro -- Goblins Artifacts
1.6​
2.4​
0.8​
WG Midrange -- Soldiers Humans
25​
BRMidrange
2​
HumansSoldiersEnchantments
25​
WUGValue
2​
WizardsEnchantments
9​
URSpellslinger
3.6​
WizardsSpells
17​
WWeenie
2.4​
SoldiersSpirits
35​
RWelder
1.2​
Artifacts
34​
RAggro
1.1​
GoblinsHumans
1.2​
1.1​
-0.1​
R Aggro -- Goblins Humans
0.9​
1.7​
0.8​
BR Aristocrats -- Artifacts
26​
BRAristocrats
2​
WarriorsVampires
26​
WUBlink
2​
SpiritsWizards
12​
WWeenie
3.2​
SpiritsSoldiers
20​
WWeenie
2.2​
SoldiersKnights
13​
RAggro
3.1​
Goblins
15​
RAggro
2.5​
Goblins
3.1​
2.5​
-0.6​
R Aggro -- Goblins
6​
7.1​
1.1​
WR Aggo -- Knights Soldiers
27​
WUBControl
1.7​
Spells
27​
GMidrange
1.9​
Enchantments
21​
WWeenie
2.2​
SoldiersKnights
31​
WWeenie
1.5​
SpiritsSoldiersArtifacts
2.5​
4.1​
1.6​
UR Burn -- Wizards Artifacts
28​
GLands Soup
1.6​
WarriorsEnchantments
28​
BRAristocrats
1.7​
Artifacts
37​
WWeenie
0.9​
SoldiersHumansArtifacts
4​
WBWeenie
4.5​
ZombiesKnights
36​
UArtifacts
1.1​
WizardsSpells
32​
UArtifacts
1.2​
WizardsSpells
1.1​
1.2​
0.1​
U Artifacts -- Wizards Spells
1.1​
1.2​
0.1​
U Artifacts -- Wizards Spells
1​
NEWBG Lands Midrange --
29​
UGRLands Midrange
1.6​
WizardsEnchantments
29​
URStorm
1.6​
Spells
7​
WBWeenie
3.8​
ZombiesKnights
18​
WGMidrange
2.4​
SoldiersHumansEnchantments
5.2​
NEWUBR Storm -- Spells
30​
WGMidrange
1.6​
WarriorsKnightsEnchantments
30​
UGLands Midrange
1.6​
Enchantments
30​
WGMidrange
1.6​
WarriorsKnightsEnchantments
2​
WRAggo
7.1​
KnightsSoldiersArtifacts
4​
UBTempo
4.8​
NinjasSpells
7​
UBTempo
3.7​
NinjasSpells
4.8​
3.7​
-1.1​
UB Tempo -- Ninjas Spells
9.2​
8.5​
-0.7​
UB Tempo -- Ninjas Spells
5.4​
NEWUG Ramp -- Enchantments
31​
WUArtifact Control
1.4​
Artifacts
31​
WWeenie
1.5​
SpiritsSoldiersArtifacts
2​
WRAggro
6​
KnightsSoldiers
10​
WRArtifact Aggro
3.3​
ArtifactsSoldiers
22​
UBTempo
2.2​
NinjasWizards
3​
UBTempo
4.8​
NinjasWizards
2.2​
4.8​
2.6​
UB Tempo -- Ninjas Wizards
1.6​
NEWUR Storm -- Spells
32​
UBGValue Midrange
1.3​
32​
UArtifacts
1.2​
WizardsSpells
14​
WRArtifact Aggro
2.8​
Artifacts
33​
WUArtifact Control
1.1​
Artifacts
20​
UBTempo
2.2​
Ninjas
2.2​
DISAPPEAREDUB Tempo -- Ninjas
33​
BRGLands Midrange
1.3​
33​
WUArtifact Control
1.1​
Artifacts
34​
WRArtifact Aggro
1.3​
SoldiersArtifactsHumans
22​
WUBlink
2.1​
SpiritsWizards
34​
WRArtifact Aggro
1.3​
SoldiersArtifactsHumans
34​
RAggro
1.1​
GoblinsHumans
31​
WUArtifact Control
1.4​
Artifacts
26​
WUBlink
2​
SpiritsWizards
32​
UBGValue Midrange
1.3​
36​
UBGValue Midrange
0.9​
1.3​
0.9​
-0.4​
UBG Value Midrange --
1.3​
0.9​
-0.4​
UBG Value Midrange --
35​
RWelder
1.2​
Artifacts
35​
BGLands Midrange
1​
10​
WUBlink
3.4​
SpiritsWizards
11​
WUContro
3.2​
WizardsSpells
36​
UArtifacts
1.1​
WizardsSpells
36​
UBGValue Midrange
0.9​
15​
WUControl
2.7​
WizardsSpells
25​
WUGValue
2​
WizardsEnchantments
13​
UBRStorm
3.1​
Spells
3.1​
NEWUBR Storm -- Spells
5.2​
NEWUBR Storm -- Spells
37​
WWeenie
0.9​
SoldiersHumansArtifacts
27​
WUBControl
1.7​
Spells
21​
UBRStorm
2.1​
Spells
2.1​
NEWUBR Storm -- Spells
38​
BRAristocrats
0.9​
Artifacts
19​
WUGValue
2.2​
WizardsSpellsEnchantments
3​
UGRamp
5.4​
Enchantments
30​
UGLands Midrange
1.6​
Enchantments
5.4​
1.6​
-3.8​
UG Lands Midrange -- Enchantments
5.4​
1.6​
-3.8​
UG Lands Midrange -- Enchantments
14​
UGRamp
2.9​
Enchantments
2.9​
NEWUG Ramp -- Enchantments
5.4​
NEWUG Ramp -- Enchantments
16​
UGRamp
2.5​
Enchantments
2.5​
NEWUG Ramp -- Enchantments
29​
UGRLands Midrange
1.6​
WizardsEnchantments
1.6​
DISAPPEAREDUGR Lands Midrange -- Wizards Enchantments
1.6​
DISAPPEAREDUGR Lands Midrange -- Wizards Enchantments
16​
URBurn
2.5​
WizardsSpells
5​
URBurn
4.1​
WizardsArtifacts
2.5​
4.1​
1.6​
UR Burn -- Wizards Artifacts
2.5​
4.1​
1.6​
UR Burn -- Wizards Artifacts
9​
URSpellslinger
3.6​
WizardsSpells
3.6​
DISAPPEAREDUR Spellslinger -- Wizards Spells
3.6​
DISAPPEAREDUR Spellslinger -- Wizards Spells
29​
URStorm
1.6​
Spells
1.6​
NEWUR Storm -- Spells
1.6​
NEWUR Storm -- Spells
12​
WWeenie
3.2​
SpiritsSoldiers
17​
WWeenie
2.4​
SoldiersSpiritsEnchantments
3.2​
2.4​
-0.8​
W Weenie -- Soldiers Spirits Enchantments
6.3​
6.1​
-0.2​
W Weenie -- Soldiers Spirits Enchantments
21​
WWeenie
2.2​
SoldiersKnights
20​
WWeenie
2.2​
SoldiersKnightsArtifacts
2.2​
2.2​
0​
W Weenie -- Soldiers Knights Artifacts
37​
WWeenie
0.9​
SoldiersHumansArtifacts
31​
WWeenie
1.5​
SpiritsSoldiers
0.9​
1.5​
0.6​
W Weenie -- Spirits Soldiers
7​
WBWeenie
3.8​
ZombiesKnights
4​
WBWeenie
4.5​
ZombiesKnights
3.8​
4.5​
0.7​
WB Weenie -- Zombies Knights
3.8​
4.5​
0.7​
WB Weenie -- Zombies Knights
30​
WGMidrange
1.6​
WarriorsKnightsEnchantments
18​
WGMidrange
2.4​
SoldiersHumans
1.6​
2.4​
0.8​
WG Midrange -- Soldiers Humans
1.6​
2.4​
0.8​
WG Midrange -- Soldiers Humans
2​
WRAggro
6​
KnightsSoldiers
2​
WRAggo
7.1​
KnightsSoldiers
6​
7.1​
1.1​
WR Aggo -- Knights Soldiers
6​
7.1​
1.1​
WR Aggo -- Knights Soldiers
14​
WRArtifact Aggro
4.1​
Artifacts
10​
WRArtifact Aggro
3.3​
ArtifactsSoldiers
4.1​
3.3​
-0.8​
WR Artifact Aggro -- Artifacts Soldiers
8.2​
3.3​
-4.9​
WR Artifact Aggro -- Artifacts Soldiers
34​
WRArtifact Aggro
4.1​
SoldiersArtifactsHumans
4.1​
DISAPPEAREDWR Artifact Aggro -- Soldiers Artifacts Humans
31​
WUArtifact Control
1.4​
Artifacts
33​
WUArtifact Control
1.1​
Artifacts
1.4​
1.1​
-0.3​
WU Artifact Control -- Artifacts
1.4​
1.1​
-0.3​
WU Artifact Control -- Artifacts
10​
WUBlink
3.4​
SpiritsWizards
22​
WUBlink
2.1​
SpiritsWizards
3.4​
2.1​
-1.3​
WU Blink -- Spirits Wizards
3.4​
4.1​
0.7​
WU Blink -- Spirits Wizards
26​
WUBlink
2​
SpiritsWizards
2​
NEWWU Blink -- Spirits Wizards
15​
WUControl
2.7​
WizardsSpells
11​
WUControl
3.2​
WizardsSpells
2.7​
3.2​
0.5​
WU Control -- Wizards Spells
2.7​
3.2​
0.5​
WU Control -- Wizards Spells
27​
WUBControl
1.7​
Spells
1.7​
DISAPPEAREDWUB Control -- Spells
1.7​
DISAPPEAREDWUB Control -- Spells
19​
WUGValue
2.2​
WizardsSpellsEnchantments
25​
WUGValue
2​
WizardsEnchantments
2.2​
2​
-0.2​
WUG Value -- Wizards Enchantments
2.2​
2​
-0.2​
WUG Value -- Wizards Enchantments


Here, we see that UBR and UR Storm have eaten the lunch of UGR Lands Midrange and UR Spellslinger--perhaps not too surprising! However, what this reveals are the knock-on/second-order effects of these changes. Weirdly enough, WR Artifact Aggro tanks the biggest hit from this*, which is surprising. However, given that R Aggro also suffers the third-most, I hypothesize that UBR/UR Storm relies on the burn spells that WR and R aggro needs to succeed. This is boosted by the fact that UR Burn shows up more as well.

As a secondary hypothesis, I suggest that the boost in WG Midrange, WB Weenie, and WU Blink are due to the now-uncontested W cards from the defunct WR deck, which suggests to me that the bots "perceive" these W cards as strong enough to get snapped up by multiple colors when not paired with WR.



Is this a problem? As we always say here, it depends on your goals! However, what this suggests to me is that R burn spells might be a lynchpin in multiple decks, so I might want to draft them first if I want to maximize my (predicted) deck power. On the design side, it might say that I have too many of these spells, and/or that I might want to pull back on W aggro cards.




*the overlap between WR Artifact Aggro and WR Aggro is likely strong; however, even if you add them together, the WR aggro decks are still tied for the greatest loss in deck share, which bolsters these findings. Similarly, UG Ramp/BRG Lands/UGR Lands might be getting retitled as UG Ramp -- Enchantments, in which case they would actually lose about 1.3 % of deck share. However, I've left these clusters discrete so as to not over-interpret.

=======================================
NOTES:

These second-order changes are purely from the availability of cards during the draft, which can be as perceived metagame forces, not due to metagame forces themselves.

There are some great single-card breakdowns in the Overperformers/Underperformers and Card Stats tabs right under the maps--check them out!

Also, this is by no means statistical. That's beyond both me and the data at this point.

Please let me know if you want my Excel sheet! It's not super, but I'm always happy to chat data.
 
Last edited:
Top