Search results

Sigh I don’t believe that is what I wrote. Can you please find a card that has that wording? “Up to one creature you control get X” I am 99 % sure there aren’t any but I have been wrong before.

That wording is also not in Magic. I mean it’s a custom card so we can write any wording we want. But if we want to keep the card simple, elegant and within the perimeters of what Magic normally does, then we can’t go with “Up to one creature you control” Am I wrong? I can’t remember a single...

And now it begins

Aaaaaaaand it’s gonna be a Sorcery

That would be weird. I can’t think of any recent card with that wording. I think the +3/+3 effect could be exchanged for a fight effect. “Tap a creature you control. It fights target creature.”

Public info: Spoilers officially start tomorrow on Monday the 24'th of May 2021

SirFunchalot Sometimes I wish your cube wasn't such high power because I really enjoy your posts and I think they are well-written!

That’s SUCH a Riptide question!

They are confirmed. Except for the UG. That was a little blurry. They had a hard time explaining what the archetype attached to blue-green was. They mentioned it had a lot of different tokens.

Man I have wanted more legendary lands (when it made sense and only when it made sense) for ages. Don’t get my hopes up with your theorizing :P Those lands would be too powerful. Any deck would want to run at least one with no downsides. It would be a cheap way to get duals into a singleton...

I do appreciate lore. You all know this about me. However it would be less on the nose if the character was wielding a bow, a wand or a short sword. Legolas Greenleaf doesn’t deal in herbology. He’s an archer. If you’re saying it just happen to be the only Battlehammer who just happen to wield...

Annoyed? Was it this comment that made you feel like someone was annoyed? I feel like I should be able to comment on decisions made by Wizards of the Coast on a forum made specifically for that. In the real world, people are not written as 'Baker'. That is a name that has grown over...

Do you happen to know the character Bruenor Battlehammer from before it was included in a Magic set? Because it sounds like you grasping for a reason to defend the name. Big Nose George comparison makes sense if Bruenor Battlehammer is also not his real name. Is it just a nickname he has been...

Fan! <3 Can’t wait for the cube blog. And the repeated “This is going to be great in the blue cube” on a monthly basis from Brad :P

A few thoughts I was pretty cold on Modern Horizons 1 but I am starting to warm up to the whole branch. This set is dripping with flavor. The blue art on the eternalize token from the mono white card Timeless Dragon because lazotep makes the creature blue. Also Cabal Coffers which is key to...

So you don’t feel cringe when they have written into their story a guy who has a last name that suits his abilities perfectly? Like Jon big Nose or Adele Flower (guy with a large nose and a woman who is into herbology)

I mean.. When it’s scripted, it’s on purpose and not random like your baker-butcher example.

That’s pretty poor writing :) Unless there is a really good story that gave him that name like the Indians used to name their people or Daenerys Stormborn from GoT.

Regarding planeswalkers on in D&D: (It’s a link. You can click on it to read it all.) They had an opportunity here to create a Magic set without walkers but they wanted to ‘upgrade’ a few characters from legendary creatures to planeswalkers just because they thought it would be cool.

I expect this to be a set with tons of cool references and I’m not going to get a single one of them.