Search results

Demonic Junker I might include this, or I might custom up a version that doesn't have the destroy your own creature text, which is mostly just additive distraction for me. I have an artifact deck and I am running a tokenshifted oni-cult anvil, but gameplay wise this isn't really the goal of my...

Maybe they figure the text "add R for each goblin you control" is such a removal magnet it either won't work, or it'll only work once...like a ritual! XD

Nice modality! We've had GG 3/3s for ages but this is a nice carrot Crew 4 is just so much but hey that's a fine kicker on an otherwise medium sorcery. I could see it This is a lot of investment, so I'd imagine if this is finding anything you're either desperate or assembling an infinite. YMMV

Its strictly worse, isn't it? Scryfall took over the same codebase and has been building that since they caved, no? I mean unless you mean astheically, and honestly, ugh no.

Before anyone says it I don't think there's much to be gained from these being any good other than to say that you did it :P Like yeah that red one's still bad (Frost Walker) but would a 5/1 be enticing? Would a 6/1? I think these are a bad place to put the "lets print enticing cards for...

Teehee funny blue shell card This is gonna kill so many casters and opponents and I love it Racing people with this be like

Huh, I might not actually, I hadn't thought of that Oh lord rewriting my muscle memory from M+A+Tab from back in the magiccards.info days was bad enough

So this card is good in a way that probably makes it not so great :p Like okay sweet, another 2/1 for B for your aristocrats deck which specifically wants to load up on as many copies (virtual or otherwise) of gravecrawler (Who got sweet new amonkhet art in the EDH deck btw). I figure if...

The only way I ever access scryfall is typing S C and then hitting tab and entering my query

This does a lot of damage, and also might just be the kind of card you don't want on a sorcery if its going to be effective given how all or nothing it is. At least Tezzeret, Agent of Bolas gives your opponent a turn. @TrainmasterGT Looks like they listened to your cycling complaint :p But...

So I also noticed it on the new Basri, who justifies cycling 3 on the same merits as here, and the 5 mana 8/8, where that cycling cost is less about cycling and more about snakeskin veil Edit: full list of cyclers at time of writing: All the cycling 3 cards shown are justified in being very...

I think cycling 3 is very justified here in that this card is so early game, and cheap cycling would make it SO free. The triomes deffinitly don't deserve cycling 2 for eg, and I feel similarly here. So this is from the commander set, but I'm kinda into it? Chatterfang was legitimately great...

Interesting flexibility on this trigger, kind of in the middle of you attack and this attacks! You need to attack with a vehicle sure, and probably him, but you get the bailout clause of other pirates if you have them. I hope we see more stuff that rewards things other than max speed, given...

Its actually the original plan for monstrosity, but the rules manager at the time wouldn't let them do it :P

I like this. Little bit of synergy upside, nice payoff, and it's probably smother (fetchlands) in a deck that doesn't care which is a fine floor. I've been running Ghastly Demise for a while which I like, but I don't love the nonblack restriction and there is something to be said for a 1 mana...

Samut is just running this race on foot

If you've found that Staff of the Storyteller was a bit too much for your cube, consider swapping to my less free version: Also I made this tokenshifted version of Sanguine Evangelist, apparently that card is sweet but I don't want bats

This thing has been super sweet BTW, having run it for a while now Really neat dimension for GW, and also finding artifacts/enchantments means you can find stuff like Bind the Monster or Wild Growth or Portable Hole or Retrofitter Foundry or Dead Weight or Seal of Fire or Executioner's Capsule

Just because I run a fast-land custom version doesn't mean I don't agree with you :P

I think that's fine in 2024 Edit: ah shoot I guess you can't then rip