Search results

That is a very important point when it comes to analyzing how your cube plays out. Since I've started tracking my cube's drafts and games 13 drafts ago, I've had a good friend of mine participate innthree drafts. He is a less invested player and always drafts black-based aristocrats decks...

But isn't colorless tremendously easy to support with a bunch of pain lands? They are effectively trilands that enter untapped. Not every cube needs to have a fetch+shock modern like mana base. I'd just start by having these be my only fixing lands in a cube build around Eldrazi. Also, just 12...

I think it is vey sad to cut colorless. If there is one cube that should make it work it's this one. I'd rather cut all the gold cards to make the mana work.

Summer Update Pt. 1 Yeah, I know, it's not july yet, but I want to post this now. I've thought about my cube quite a lot when I was collecting data and I couldn't help myself. This is eleven cards, so I could change up to four more cards, according my self-imposed rules of only updating twice...

It is really diffucult to choose an egg that works with multiple different archetypes without having those bleed together. If they all are supposed to be interested in 5+ copies of it, then every deck will have 5+ copies of it. And since you would want multiple strategies to work with it, you...

Yeah, I think DT is much better. I play Vampiric for that very reason. It's just not free and you need a good reason, like a sweet build around, to put it into your deck and have it be correct.

I'm tinkering with this right now Aetherworks Marvel

I mean, the average person consumes a similar amount of plastic per week anyway in the form of microplastics. It's probably not worse than using a lot of cosmetics while chewing 15 bubble gums.

Scourge of Fleets Disintegrate Destructive Force Beanstalk Giant Krosan Tusker Wolfbriar Elemental Roar of the Wurm Genesis Wave Meteor Golem Nine. More than I thought. But 5 of them have a cheaper mode.

Turns out that was a shitty idea, huh

I would honestly be very interested in hearing about your 40 archetypes as well :o

Yes, I'll do it like this. And round to full numbers where needed. This way I can also get win percentages: 4 cards done, 496 to go. Yes, exactly. It's just not possible to have a good time with friends, play and joke around AND also keep track of all the details. No GIHWR here.

But now I seriously have a problem here. See, my document looks like eight pages of this: The first column is the matches won, the second the number of drafts the card was used in, and then the quote I calculated from the first two numbers. Now, I could of course just re-do this table with...

Really cool contest idea. And I have already found my egg.

Is it really broken? I doubt it's better than Brainstorm considering dredge 1 is far less dangerous than dredge 4+ and is also not crazy at filling your 'yard. Or, wait. Could it dredge from it's own draw?

See, @Mown is right in terms of how I've been doing it. I check how many matches a card won per draft, which means for one use (either maindecked or brought in from the sideboard in a relevant manner) it can get 0, 1, 2 or 3 points. You @Onderzeeboot are probably right though, that game wins...

I have this insider tip for you

They are definitely notfor every deck. Also, if they were average, they would be closer to 1.5, right?

The talismans aren't even that good in my environment. In the past 13 drafts, they have all together been maindecked 28 times and they only won 30 matches. That's barely a 1.07 match win rate. At the same time, my green ramp spells have been played 54 times and collected 82 wins, which is a 1.52...

No. If certain conditions are met; most importantly, greens ramp must be better (which can be achieved by being cheaper or more synergistic or more explosive). Second, it needs to be more plentiful (you should be able to build a ramp deck without mana rocks but not without green).