Search results

Rankle has a sweet effect once per turn in a lot of different decks. Yawg can be GRBS in a sac deck.

Careful actually sort of sucks. I haven't liked it whenever I tried it. FoF and Gifts are pretty slow to resolve and HEAVILY favor more experienced players. Not a 4, but Thirst for Knowledge has plenty of artifacts to pitch in your list.

Wording??? When ~ ETBs or attacks (or you draw, or whatever, I know wording here), put a NAME counter on it. At the beginning of your upkeep, if ~ has a NAME counter on it, apply the following effects: N or more: Effect A. N+ or more: Effect B. 7 or more: Effect C. Bold is the issue. Not sure...

Fuck yeah! Take that, everyone!! BOOM! As I've changed my designs to be more 2007-ish, I have a great appreciation for something that simply attacks really well. Exemplified by the Ravnican Zoo decks with Savannah Lions, Watchwolf, Burning-Tree Shaman, etc. A lot of the creatures of the era...

Maybe not, but it has either Boros or Rakdos icons on it and is a Mardu card overall, so I could believe it. All kinda depends on how you view these color schemes.

I'd start by seeing how many enchantment creatures are around the desired power level, as those should be really easy to slot in without being parasitic. Making a lot of the removal enchantment based isn't too difficult and offers an opportunity to cast auras without as much worrying about an...

https://riptidelab.com/forum/threads/the-black-cube.2058/page-2#post-92117 I've got a bit of an enchantment post here. Not super helpful, but it's more than nothing. I think a lot of the enchantment creatures are good if you power down and it's easy to run W or B enchantment based removal. The...

I'd run this if I could: planar cleansing Four simple words get the job done.

Each player is going to get 72-120 cards instead of 45? Seems unnecessary. That's a big "if." I agree it'll gravitate more heavily towards whatever is supported, though.

Magic isn't dead?

https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/alexullman-030414-removing-removal-in-cube TL;DR: ROE: 1.95 asfan INN: 1.7 asfan Not clear what they counted as removal. I go for asfan of 2. Asfan is how many you'd expect to see per pack "as fanned" out, so 2/15 cards, or ~13.33%. We found in another thread...

Total rework in sig. All of the cheaper cards have been ordered, which is 80%+ of it. I'll know when I update the owned/not owned on CC after I reconfigure the paper cube. I have 7-9 people ready to draft on the 14th.

Let's be really honest. 2007 is as far as any of us made it.

I think a set feeling old after a few weeks is a symptom of Standard, not Arena. It's going to get figured out pretty quickly and you're likely going to see the same few matchups over and over. I personally don't care about it being out on Arena sooner. Doesn't affect my cube at all. I think...

I'll be honest, I've forgotten the designs and it's too much to go back and forth and reply to the reply. Rhystic Aven is cool. Maybe haste on the Chimera design? Is it Brw or Wbr? Either way, haste seems appropriate.

If you don't intend to proxy, one is 100x more expensive than the other. I think ninjas are neat.

Is there a difference between "spell velocity" and having a quite low curve? Would it be from having payoffs for casting things?

Allied slow fetches into enemy tricycles?

Maybe I could reword to Whenever ~ is dealt damage by a creature, it deals N damage to that creature. Getting rid of "combat damage" gives a target in the first half of the effect and it's like 95%+ the same effect. I'll probably do that.

Is there real wording for a Boros Reckoner style card that's heavily nerfed? "Whenever ~ is dealt combat damage, it deals (X damage) to the creature that dealt that damage." I can't find another card that does this. They all hit the player or any creature/target.