Search results

1. Ramping into a 7 seems totally viable, but, you're right, it needs to be a good one. I'd try to make any kicked removal spell able to kill the 7s when possible. KIlling a 7 for 2-3 mana is a beating. ETBs, death triggers, and protection to ensure value will be important here. 2. Do it if...

1. Fair within the rules. I can't imagine wanting TOO many X spells, anyways. 2. Might as well. 3. If they look like they make sense to run, do it. Agree with whydirt that shifting card evaluations is fun. The Black Cube is full of that kind of thing. 4. As unfun as usual, I guess? Also, RR is...

It's gonna be hard to make it come together at 700, but maybe Wort is fine just taking legitimate goblins back.

9?

Love weird designs. You could overwrite the CMCs on CC for kicker, etc, to get a better idea of the real curve and later export as text and reupload to get it back to all 237. Is there a reason someone made it 237 and not 146 or something else?

tarfire warren weirding nameless inversion wort, boggart auntie

TFW your entire cube is a sign you should be in black. That said, I've been doing this for a while. Not particularly intentionally, but I relaxed on removal power band a bit. Like you said, the "worse" removal tends to get an added benefit of some sort to balance it out. Also, one removal...

Holy shit. I totally thought I clicked into CBS lol.

What removal write up? I don't see anything in this thread like that.

When I look at nonblack cards, that one always appeals to me. So does Urban Evolution. Both seem like a cool way to reload and continue ramping at the same time. That said, I've played neither.

Yeah. Lorwyn and Onslaught were thematically really nice.

Can a mod change the thread title to Lorwyn Hate Thread?

I might steal that idea.

Heroic, as the listed example, makes all your auras, targeted instants/sorceries, etc more interesting. Do you need a targeting spell? Do you need another Hero to target? Which one should you draft in this pack? Oh, here's Bonds of Faith, that's a uniquely flexible addition to this deck to add...

Bro, I got you.

True. I think there's good tribal, like Wizard's Lightning where the card is playable and gets better in the tribal deck, and there's bad tribal, like Elven Ambush, where the card is only good in one deck. I guess the laziness comes from making yet another tribal themed set. I usually like it...

Cleaving Reaper {3}{B}{B} Creature — Angel Berserker Flying, trample Pay 3 life: Return Cleaving Reaper from your graveyard to your hand. Activate this ability only if you had an Angel or Berserker enter the battlefield under your control this turn. “I won’t pollute my blade with your blood...

I feel like such a hypocrite liking both of these posts. Tribal designs are pretty lazy and I'm tired of seeing them. Especially giants. Big tribal isn't really a thing because you can't fill the board with 12 giants like you can with elves, goblins, zombies, etc. That said, my playgroup is...

I'm pretty strongly considering 2 per 3c section. Dimir just count as blue cards in my list, as I'm anticipating everyone runs black as a base. I actually have a hidden list right now that's 20% less wordy. Didn't want to edit the main list in case it didn't pan out. It's tough to decrease...

I thought about that, but with over half the cube being black, that would be either a huge misdraft or WU would legitimately have to be wide open. You'd also have to ignore me telling you that it's color imbalanced before we started. So that shouldn't be an issue. I might also just go down to...