Search results

I too remember blowing people out of the water with Harm's Way in limited. Good times :)

These are all the sets I consider relevant for Cube purposes, that is, all releases that added new cards to the card pool. For those interested, here's the original source for this image. The article echoes a feeling a lot of us share, and I think this single line sums it up best: "It has...

Aaaaaan it's gone :')

I don't think you can leave off the purple ones, but I do think you can remove the products with no symbol and a lot of the blue symbols. Basically all of the reprint only stuff is irrelevant for anything other than card accessibility and border fetishism (of which I myself am guilty, I want...

I thought it was a proper fun discussion. I've been on these board for a looooong time, and years ago the number of lateral thinkers and/or mischievous spirits on here was so high that literally every thread would derail into some tangent on a topic that, strictly speaking, belonged in another...

At the very least it's a mono blue card that can deal with X/1's.

Edit: Had to update the rules text and the flavor text :p Also, forgot to include the art link.

If you're looking for a weirdly Dimir cantrip, you could do: "Look at the bottom card of target player's library. You may put that card on top of that player's library, then draw a card."

I was about to say, fateseal is a keyword that technically exists :) It was featured on only two cards, but one of them saw extensive play in Commander, before they changed the tuck rule. Nowadays you can put your commander in your command zone any time it changes zones, but back then, Spin into...

emerge unscathed fight as one Phalanx tactics rimrock knight Briarhorn blossoming defense agony warp atarka's command Collision // colossus zealous persecution Integrity // intervention quandrix command These are the combat tricks I currently run. I know Agony Warp doubles as a straight up...

I am truly sorry if this was the post that offended you. I only meant to take the discussion on Murderous Scarecrow to this topic, as you requested here. I did not mean for this post to come across as aggressive or bullying.

You did absolutely nothing wrong! <3 I enjoy engaging in discussion, and for some reason this has me end up in an escalating argument with Velrun every now and then. While I can be persistent, I try my best to discuss in a polite and civil manner, and I honestly don't know what it is in my way...

I think this is pretty much where I would put it; Gravecrawler > Bloodsoaked Champion >= Murderous Scarecrow. There's not much between Champion and Scarecrow. Having played with the Champion a lot, I think it just edges out the Scarecrow because it's relatively easy to recur in aggro decks, just...

Thanks for pointing this out, because I really needed to be put in my place here. After all, I took the time to explain my reasoning for why I think it isn't broken, and you refused to do so unless someone continued the discussion in this thread. Which I did. To which you replied: "Broken :p"...

That argument is not going to convince me any more in this thread than it did in the other.

Okay, here you go. PS. It's totally on brand for Riptide to go off topic though, just go with the flow ;)

I'll bite, because I'm curious why @Velrun thinks this is broken.

This perfectly illustrates the difference between Gravecrawler and the custom card. Whether you sacrifice the land or the Murderous Scarecrow, then retrace it, you're down a land card. Obviously losing a land in hand isn't the same as losing a land in play, though at turn 4, you will often have...

I mean, we can agree to disagree, but I don't find your argument of "trust me, it's broken" very compelling for all the reasons I laid out. You haven't provided any examples of how the 2/1 is broken, nor have you provided any example of other recursive 2/1's historically being broken in (almost)...