Search results

Is it that hard? Just use two coins or something like that to hide the upper right mana cost and the lower right p/t. Do not use the same items to denote +1/+1 or something else

True, but this also holds for wishes… The point was that wishes suck in cube due to forcing the target to be out of your deck as opposed to the tutors. The tempo argument is valid, but I prefer it when you can durdle a turn without losing (but also not without a penalty).

Well, this exactly does not hold for tutors. Tutors are just like the good cards in your deck so a tutor becomes the best card you can tutor for as opposed to wishes where the wish requires the card to be outside the deck. In other words, a tutor is exactly like you had the card in question...

I guess it is powerful, but fair? It becomes w: create a 1/1. Maybe it is too powerful. I would pick a deck from your new cube and see how it fares against this combo. If it wins half, then it is okay. Monument cost 3, adds nothing to the board

If you want to sac creatures without comboing then I suggest soldevi adnate

Many tokens are artifacts right? Clues, treasure, powerstone, it all helps it grow

There are multiple options. Chopping the curve down is just one way to achieve it. It does not mean more choices and consequences. If you have many aggro one drops, it does not matter which one you play. If you have an aggro 2 drop and another 2 drop then you have choices. Only going at the...

It is true that aggro does not necessary need 1-drops. However, this implies that aggro is only possible/viable if the midrange start appropriately late, e.g, is relative expensive.

This is a great card. Hits much more than ostracize|ulg it can even be cast against an empty handed to remove something from the yard.

I would say it is so basic

No, I love it. It is balanced. It is way too strong for 3 mana, but it does not cost only 3 mana. That is the point. The conditions are such that you often can only cast it later, similarly to a rancor. That one cost one, but it is very unlikely that you can play it on turn one. Ruinator is...

That is not true. Skaab costs more than a regular three drop. Namely, it makes it harder to cast again as opposed to a normal 3 mana. It is mana wise cheap, very strong, and recursive, but it has quite an additional cost. Yes you can move on to cast another 3 or 4 drop, but on a normal creature...

Yes, you gain some and you lose some. The complexity of cubes which uses all cards (and all abilities) is high. Yes, that werewolf is very nice, but do you need it? Can’t you make a custom without having the bother of night and day? It all depends on your playgroup and how often the cube is...

Well, even less stuff would be to have only cards made by Pete venters. Or only use sets on a certain plane Or only use brushwags

We already have that. rout

Since plants are creatures in magic and artifacts are something artificial, a creature would fit better. That said, maybe have it be a permanent without a type? Or create a new type for these kind of tokens

It sure does make sense. When turning stuff upside down it forces you to rethink. I like that, but it is not an easy task. It probably requires a few passes, and is more likely that you are better off with a complete new game. It is very hard for players who know mtg when the rules are changed a...

Thank you. This was my point exactly. It is probably fun for a few tries and then the novelty wears of and people recognise that it is unbalanced and boring. Not that I mean it cannot be pulled of. On the contrary, but turning the rules upside down requires a different viewpoint and probably a...

I love that they work together. Just like in the books of ya olde age (it was rumoured that these two kept in touch despite the fight between the two brothers if I remember correctly)

The problem with utterly degenerate is that it becomes stale quite quickly. However, what I would do is just use one of your regular cubes and add this rule and see what happens. If you like what happens you can make a special cube