Search results

I'll code up an example alternative in D3 when I have time. I mostly do static graphs in R and only dabble in web graphics. In the meantime: This is a bit of a classic case of a graph that has all the information but takes much longer to process than it should. For example, let's say I want...

I like it, but it's super buggy for me: http://riptidelab.com/forum/threads/seacoast-drake-is-the-best-card-in-m14.165/page-2

FWIW I run neither Gorehouse or Cloistered Youth and those sections still feel plenty strong. White: Accorder Paladin Kor Skyfisher Leonin Relic-Warder Stoneforge Mystic Fencing Ace Lone Missionary Wall of Omens Thalia, Guardian of Thraben Red: Mogg War Marshal Burning-Tree Emissary...

Yeah, fun maximization is incredibly difficult. 20 years later and Wizards are still improving at it.

Hey Ben, what software are you using for creating your analytics graphs? I have some ideas for improving the visualizations. Another thought I had regarding the pick orders it seems like things might get "stuck" in a suboptimal place. Like let's say my list starts off with people picking lands...

One time I put together a 3 - 0 Rec-Sur deck with Thragtusk and just felt like a terrible human being. There was not really anything my opponents could do about it. Recurring Nightmare is no longer in my cube.

So this is actually a really interesting topic and one that is hard to address. I deal with a variant of it in my ChannelFireball cube reviews. All cubes are different. However, if we just say they are different and leave it at that we don't have much common ground for discussion. "There are...

Thrummingbird + Animar + Pentad Prism? :)

I think it would be pretty good. It's a slower environment than my normal cube.

The closest card I can think of to Kalonian Hydra is Darksteel Colossus. Aside from the indestructibility they have quite a bit in common. Oh, and the mana cost.

Uh... I dunno. Maybe just make a post and see what that looks like?

Jeez, I just take a 5-minute bike ride to the center of town on a city bike.

Singleton lists are always mentally hard to parse. Visually it's much easier to grok with a picture. I don't know if there's an easy answer for that. It just takes a lot more time to process the text than the picture.

Aggro Ulamog? Yeah, that deck looks pretty wild. Cards are in the mail (except for Chord of Calling), so with any luck we can draft it next Tuesday.

Give it time. We're still small, but we're growing every day.

Halimar Depths is one hell of a land.

Yeah, it's a delicate balance. My cube is extremely aggressive, to the point where control simply doesn't stand a chance without some early defensive guys. There are many dynamics that can work, and as long as it's working for you I'd say that's a good thing.

Pauper constructed taught me to hate Invigorate. It's probably more fun in cube.

Great work Eric! I would say the next thing we need is a "deck" button in the post editor (as well as a much needed "spoiler" button).

Yeah, this feels like it's pretty heavily in the personal preference domain (not that there's anything wrong with that). I can see the card's appeal, but I would imagine most players don't get the same thrill out of a vanilla creature with a back end.