Search results

The point I tried to make is that in a topdeck mode I rather have a 1/1 which filters me than a land. Yes, it is vulnerable, but destroy is not cheap. If the opponent is destroying my land I am quite happy.

I like emergent. It makes the land a creature which makes it a better card than rampant in my book. Rampant growth is a real bad topdeck, emergent slightly less bad. I cannot see your cube but I do not know edge is better than growth in your cube. Either they do the same, or one is sacrifice a...

The dream with rielle is a wheel for 7 and then you get 7 additional cards. Eruth does the same and more. Rielle needs a card to go off, eruth is the card that makes you go off by making your draw one draw two. In most scenario’s erith is stronger, especially in storm (unless you need a...

Isn’t razorfin hunter and the likes a better fit for call of the death-dweller? doing damage only once and being a roadblock is maybe a tad to fragile?

Granted, they do not end the game but moat Worship Only works with brought back though

Smokestack dang I got sniped

I find it strange that a tap symbol is copyrighted. Many games use it and it is very natural. It is like copyrighting the hand sign you should use when you bike and want to make a turn. Furthermore, they just should make great cards. When a company resorts to blackmail it is often a sign that...

ornithopter

Is it that hard? Just use two coins or something like that to hide the upper right mana cost and the lower right p/t. Do not use the same items to denote +1/+1 or something else

True, but this also holds for wishes… The point was that wishes suck in cube due to forcing the target to be out of your deck as opposed to the tutors. The tempo argument is valid, but I prefer it when you can durdle a turn without losing (but also not without a penalty).

Well, this exactly does not hold for tutors. Tutors are just like the good cards in your deck so a tutor becomes the best card you can tutor for as opposed to wishes where the wish requires the card to be outside the deck. In other words, a tutor is exactly like you had the card in question...

I guess it is powerful, but fair? It becomes w: create a 1/1. Maybe it is too powerful. I would pick a deck from your new cube and see how it fares against this combo. If it wins half, then it is okay. Monument cost 3, adds nothing to the board

If you want to sac creatures without comboing then I suggest soldevi adnate

Many tokens are artifacts right? Clues, treasure, powerstone, it all helps it grow

There are multiple options. Chopping the curve down is just one way to achieve it. It does not mean more choices and consequences. If you have many aggro one drops, it does not matter which one you play. If you have an aggro 2 drop and another 2 drop then you have choices. Only going at the...

It is true that aggro does not necessary need 1-drops. However, this implies that aggro is only possible/viable if the midrange start appropriately late, e.g, is relative expensive.

This is a great card. Hits much more than ostracize|ulg it can even be cast against an empty handed to remove something from the yard.

I would say it is so basic

No, I love it. It is balanced. It is way too strong for 3 mana, but it does not cost only 3 mana. That is the point. The conditions are such that you often can only cast it later, similarly to a rancor. That one cost one, but it is very unlikely that you can play it on turn one. Ruinator is...

That is not true. Skaab costs more than a regular three drop. Namely, it makes it harder to cast again as opposed to a normal 3 mana. It is mana wise cheap, very strong, and recursive, but it has quite an additional cost. Yes you can move on to cast another 3 or 4 drop, but on a normal creature...