Search results

Maybe make it "exile target artifact or enchantment"? The Sultai charm style hidden extra option

Wait wth is that new card art?

So, I've had a cube for a little while now and I like to tinker with it and my players enjoy playing with. As word has gotten around, friends of the regular players have showed some interest in joining us, so that's what I'm pondering about right now. For a beginner to sit down and try to make...

What about changing it to "until end of turn, if a creature would enter the battlefield, it gains haste." and making it the first mode?

Is that not true of all pods?

Red gets to blow up both artifacts and lands. Maybe it could just be a braids? With some twist on the timing, maybe. Relentless King looks sick! Love it.

Maybe consider how each pair interacts with morphs? Blinking is already one thing, are there other? Both with your own and or your opponents morphs.

Liking the look of things! How about making Zotan more sac-oriented, like a symmetrical pox effect? Maybe make it 2{B/R}{B/R}: each player sacs a creature? Might have to move it to your end step, maybe. Also, Murderous Mystic absolutely deserves a flavor text!

I hope you mean that figurally because a sharpie to jace makes me kind of nauseous

I guess it's the kind of soft combo card that some johnnies would like to go off with?

I think the "mill target player" clause is just a more flexible selfmill mode. The few times you actually have enough mill kill your opponent in the late game it's nice to have it.

If anything, a spell heavy deck is still going to have to run some bodies, so having them also be the kind of effects that the spell decks are looking for (ie burn and bounce) you up the consistency of the deck.

Aren't these prone to undo the work a R/x Stromkirk players done though?

That is a good point. If we're pushing vertical aggro, maybe we should look into what disruption we want to run both for and against the vertical guys. Tappers probably does the trick as good as bouncers, to get another hit in, but doesn't hose the decks we'd want to push.

Within red theres also firefist striker and goblin heelcutter. Also, go go team triple stromkirks! I guess blue also has sleep.

I think that hits the nail on the head right. These rules are suggested because they make playing morphs less of a mental burden, and you can approximate the behaviour of a face down morph even without knowing what morph it is, so that people want to keep coming back to the cube.

The way it played out in the decks I had it was a toolbox that could fetch either a card like parallax wave or a removal spell. If you're running a god like keranos, god of storms you can threaten to fetch that a well, because if you land rector your opponent could have to think about how...

curse of predation curse of shallow graves Surprised these haven't been mentioned already! Depending on how the cube looks, I think argothian enchantress, eidolon of blossoms and academy rector are fine as enchantress support. When you move down to lower powered formats I think you can do more...

I think the upside of actually constricting yourself to these rules, is that it gives a feeling and strategic depth to the format, because you can start to think around what kind of creature your opponent's morphed. In KTK, there was a kind of race of who could flip up a morph first just because...

I was humouring my self with the idea of morph cubes, and I think a big thing I think you need to decide on is what turns people should do what. Do you want the same tempo as in tarkir draft, with morphs turn three and unmorphs turn five? What body sizes do you want at different cmc's? I think...