Search results

But still, cut down to three abilities and you have a card :D

No you can keep it as trample and don't need the Flame Spill wording because you can use the Super-Duper Death Ray wording

oh my god oh my god oh my god I love it I love it I love it iloveit iloveit Straight into the Commander pile of the cube!

Cut two of the options and you have yourself a card! Also here are a few wordings you should consider: "has trample" should be "gains trample" See: Engineered Might "can't be countered by spells or abilities." should be "This spell can't be countered." See Supreme Verdict

I too was yawning when I saw Void Mirror But I don't mind others having their fun and/or competitive constructive formats. This is simply just a card that is not for me.

Seems like you've taken a lesson from Kaldheim, Strixhaven and D&D :D

I'll run Break Ties I am crazy about Return to Nature and this one is more expensive but also has an additional options. Probably a bit lower power but it's super flexible and you'll probably never be sad to have it in your deck.

Alright you win :) It is rare but it exists. And maybe Verdant Command is exactly a good reason to include a rare wording. It could also be the ‘Bite’ ability: “You may have a creature you control deal damage equal to its power to taget creature you don’t control.”

Sigh I don’t believe that is what I wrote. Can you please find a card that has that wording? “Up to one creature you control get X” I am 99 % sure there aren’t any but I have been wrong before.

That wording is also not in Magic. I mean it’s a custom card so we can write any wording we want. But if we want to keep the card simple, elegant and within the perimeters of what Magic normally does, then we can’t go with “Up to one creature you control” Am I wrong? I can’t remember a single...

And now it begins

Aaaaaaaand it’s gonna be a Sorcery

That would be weird. I can’t think of any recent card with that wording. I think the +3/+3 effect could be exchanged for a fight effect. “Tap a creature you control. It fights target creature.”

Public info: Spoilers officially start tomorrow on Monday the 24'th of May 2021

SirFunchalot Sometimes I wish your cube wasn't such high power because I really enjoy your posts and I think they are well-written!

That’s SUCH a Riptide question!

They are confirmed. Except for the UG. That was a little blurry. They had a hard time explaining what the archetype attached to blue-green was. They mentioned it had a lot of different tokens.

Man I have wanted more legendary lands (when it made sense and only when it made sense) for ages. Don’t get my hopes up with your theorizing :P Those lands would be too powerful. Any deck would want to run at least one with no downsides. It would be a cheap way to get duals into a singleton...

I do appreciate lore. You all know this about me. However it would be less on the nose if the character was wielding a bow, a wand or a short sword. Legolas Greenleaf doesn’t deal in herbology. He’s an archer. If you’re saying it just happen to be the only Battlehammer who just happen to wield...

Annoyed? Was it this comment that made you feel like someone was annoyed? I feel like I should be able to comment on decisions made by Wizards of the Coast on a forum made specifically for that. In the real world, people are not written as 'Baker'. That is a name that has grown over...