Search results

Sure. I also found it funny because of the name and flavor text [] :P Just not brilliant because the changes don’t make much sense to me. Maybe someone can explain them to me and then I’ll board the brilliant train.

Does this mean that if the MDFC were counted as one card (as they should since a player has to read all the words on both sides before they understand that one card) the data would indicate that we see an even higher increase in card complexity?

Oh this one! :) I don’t understand the flavor text. I also don’t understand the relationship between paying one {W} to have a card saying “target permanent.” Why one mana?

Multi cleave Such a brilliant fake! Onde took the words out of my mouth. Several of the sentences can mean different things depending on what other [] are removed or not. Brilliant. I especially like that “{1}:minus one” because originally it refers to the {G}’s restriction on mana value but...

Okay it's time. What have you got? Do-It-Yourself Seraph

Wait, who said it was ruining the game? I totally missed that comment. Totally agree on Demonic Bargain. Really cool card. I had the same card as a custom in 2013 with 7 cards and not 13. Thirteen is a much better design because it actually hurts and it complicates running two. And thirteen is...

To satisfy this requirement :p

I missed that they reprinted this

Wizards do cards like in their Horizons sets. This is a very real candidate for a print soon.

Busted

Yeah that would have sold it for me. Obviously we don’t know how Kamigawa will turn out but from what we know do far, it sounds like it would fit. We would probably have complained still :P

I feel like Cleave could have been better named. I also feel like it could have played on a different axis so we wouldn’t talk about it just being kicker. I suggested something like cleave had to remove exactly two [] instead of all. Or exactly one. Or something crazy. Now it feels like we’re...

I play the green because I like when ramp cards get you more lands than one. How else am I going to make Emrakul, the Aeon’s Torn and Emrakul, the Promised End not traps? :P

You know what would be a cool way to do the Cleave [mechanic]? If the mechanic said you HAD to remove exactly two [] instead of all.

I was just making a joke. I didn’t actually tell you well enough to take credit :)

I did! https://riptidelab.com/forum/threads/secret-lair-spoilers.3174/post-110245

Of course :P

Also (yes I am continuing, lol) If you want consistency, maybe this should include the card text and not only the names. Maybe creating X tokens with a random dying ability is not consistency. Maybe having a spell that not only create tokens but also surveils (as an external ability from the...

Okay no harm done @Onderzeeboot I don’t think you have a pattern yet. We only have five cards to compare. And even if we do have a pattern, it’s not 100 % certain that the pattern exists to be a pattern. Maybe it’s coincidental. Just because five cats crossed the street from left to right...