Search results

This thread was inspired by someone over on the subreddit, so props to them. (Original thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/mtgcube/comments/nvk2au/i_tried_this_in_my_cube_and_i_think_it_might_be_a/) I would never play any cards with the "Partner With" ability in my cube, let alone "Partner."...

No, he just puts that on the outside of his Magic boxes in case he loses them, silly!

I think this might be a little reductionist, if only because power level is self-referential. For example, Second Sunrise is by no means going to be great if you stick it in a random cube, and will be cut in this 'iterative powermax' process you describe. However, if you have a functioning Eggs...

Hatesealed? No no, this is Hatestart. Seriously though, I like the idea a lot. As to the collusion issue, randomize them or, hey, play with people who aren't going to be jerks (that is, who will all agree to be on roughly the same level of competitiveness and who care about competition more...

Yes. ...well, it would matter as a tag for Commander and for a spell being counted as Historic, but those are both edge cases (okay, one is a very large edge case). Kind of like the Tribal supertype, Legendary would be mostly decorative outside of these specific scenarios.

Sliversmith I would have thought there'd be more cards the Daredevil could go infin-ish with, but I think this is it. Still probably costs too much, but I think it could work without too much trouble in a cube that's both heavy on artifacts and discard. Could do work with Desecrated Tomb, but...

Summoned by all this talk of Balduvian Trading Post, no doubt.

Yeah, of course not--if I'm being honest, it's mostly to help me keep track of what I'm doing. Thanks!

@Modin Oh, yeah, it's super restrictive. What I'm doing for lands is like 32 Terramorphic Expanses or something and calling it a day. @Jason Waddell Are we allowed purely aesthetic customs? Because we have so many cards in multiples, I'd like to signify how many of each card there is in the...

You are <3 In actuality, "pog" is derived from the English "Play Of (the) Game," and grew to popularity with the video game Overwatch (2016). In this game, after each match the players are treated to a ~10 second clip of what was algorithmically determined to be the best play of the game from...

So....uh.... I dunno how you'll feel about this one. However, I'd wanted to ask--why TrainmasterGT? What's that got to do with anything? And I figured I'd better bring an offering.

Heart eyes emoji. While not being able to cast it as a topdeck stinks, I like that this isn't a bajillion dollars. Plus, two upkeeps is not all that long of a time, and 2 is a lot less than 4. I will probably test this, especially if I cave to adding some cascade in. This + the red 2-drop...

I was just about to suggest a BTP react! Seconded.

Did they "leak," or are they just using these tantalizing tidbits to draft cube designers for their cube designer cube? Are you really as innocent as you seem, Jason, or are you part of this dastardly scheme yourself??

The more I read up on Balduvian Trading Post the more convinced I am that it's some incredibly elaborate April Fool's Day joke by you all. Has it been scoured from the internet? I can find a couple of saved records of it on waybackmachine, but both of them redirect...right back here. ... Or...

Modern is a higher-powered format than Standard because the average Modern deck will dunk on the average Standard deck. The problem with extending this analogy is that while Vintage/Legacy may be higher-powered than Modern, there's not always the same lopsidedness in matchups between decks of...

Sorry, I kind of mixed the sarcasm with the serious--I genuinely like these sorts of staxy enchantments that can backfire horribly. Of course, this doesn't make you sacrifice anything, but I like the minigames that come along with rearranging the importance of various cards, like how this would...

Me, an intellectual, and you, a fool of a prince: Source for those not in the know; please do not watch around children. Or do, depending on the child:

Gotta make it cost BRUWGG to make it as close to BRU(SH)W(A)GG as possible, otherwise a fine card. Genuinely, I kind of like this design space as an interesting expansion of tribal decks! Sure, Brushwaggs don't exactly need the support for Legacy/Vintage, but another, smaller tribe like...