Search results

  1. sigh

    General CBS

    I've since realized this is an endemic problem in cube designing lol; after I played the most jank pile-of-cards-tossed-together cube while sitting around a small table in a hotel room... and having as much if not more fun than the carefully statistic-ed cube I've made.
  2. sigh

    The Dandy Cube (Chris Taylor's Cube)

    If Obzedat is any precedent to work off of, it would successfully flicker back, since exile is where the flicker effect expects to find it already
  3. sigh

    Delver Cube

    they can feel free to sideboard it/them
  4. sigh

    General How much do you love Magic right now

    I like saying "Bear Force 1"
  5. sigh

    General How much do you love Magic right now

    The only place I still play magic (occasionally at lunch at work) there are such decks as "bear tribal" (me), "Wanderer Pestilence", "transformers.dec", "DnD.dec" and so on.
  6. sigh

    General How much do you love Magic right now

    I do not play nor buy magic anymore, so I'd put interest at ~0%, but don't know if "disgusted" is the word I'd use lmao. Still picked that one.
  7. sigh

    General Custom Cards: The Lab

    Humans must do this. If they are using works in a way that is legally derivative, EVERY source used in such a way must be listed/paid/licensed with/etc. And it should be far, far, far, far easier for an AI to do this effortlessly. It's already linking keywords to certain functions internally...
  8. sigh

    General Custom Cards: The Lab

    I agree with the overall sentiment of the post, just don't mix legally derivative and inspirationally, educationally, or observationally derivative. Like yes, all art that uses paint and brushes is "derived" from the original humans that invented that technology thousands of years ago, but it...
  9. sigh

    General Custom Cards: The Lab

    Like, at a very basic level, it's just common knowledge that you credit a traditional artist when using their work. Almost everyone in this thread does that consistently already. This is one of the foundations of how artists get traffic to their work. Why doesn't MidJourney have to at least...
  10. sigh

    General Custom Cards: The Lab

    Yeah my view has the livelihoods of the artists in mind. Not saying you don't, but at the end of the day, it's that effect bit. At the end of the day, the AI can't be made homeless. The human can. And with the perverse reality that their work was part of the input into the "learning" algorithm...
  11. sigh

    General Custom Cards: The Lab

    And as always in law, intent and effect are ever-important. If the tool is for example non-profit and it's license prohibits direct use for commercial purposes, it would be harder to find it in violation of commercial protections. If someone needs a piece for a sold product, they still need to...
  12. sigh

    General Custom Cards: The Lab

    A) depending on how they copy, it will be derivative, and will be subject to copyright. B) Otherwise it's fair use or be distinct enough to not even some up as CR, which I've already discussed, and C) the AI isn't "learning". The inputter is using the algorithms inside to generate derivatives...
  13. sigh

    General Custom Cards: The Lab

    Yeah I'm talking about copyright law. A clearly defined set of rules, not your general ideas about payment for services in all aspects of life. And in most cases, there is payment there anyways: They do. They pay for art school. They were. They are called software engineers, mechanical...
  14. sigh

    General Custom Cards: The Lab

    So it's not the fact that it's new tech (like I said). Or necessarily that it would replace/change how artists would make money. It's the combination of replacing an artist in the generation of works with the fact that their art needs to be directly used to do so. In classic copyright law this...
  15. sigh

    General Custom Cards: The Lab

    I certainly agree with a lot of aspects of what you said, and in general is the whole "if lives weren't at stake this would be viewed as a great tool by more". As a proof of concept engine? Yeah, absolutely. As a way to knock out some quick mock ups without having to deal with finding...
  16. sigh

    General Custom Cards: The Lab

    And of course, as usual, the base problem here is *jazz hands* capitalism. If the concern of artists losing their living and being tossed to the curb wasn't in the picture, I think overall this would be viewed as a much more beneficial collaborative technology. I mean, lots of things would be...
  17. sigh

    General Custom Cards: The Lab

    And I should say, I think the derived work bit applies even to works not a direct structural copy of some composition. This isn't you spending 2 years mastering the same techniques they use so you can also create art in that style. This is using their works to... derive a work in their style...
  18. sigh

    General Custom Cards: The Lab

    Basically what Spice Witch said. Like, say you want a book cover in a certain artists style. Previously, you would commission that artist and they would make a book cover. They would get a nice little check and move on with their day; you would get a nice little book cover and move on with your...
  19. sigh

    General Custom Cards: The Lab

    AI Art as a new tool for generating unique and interesting works = good AI Art as a mass-mechanism for stealing existing artists works without credit to derive its results = bad Is how I see it. They do look real nice.
  20. sigh

    Card/Deck Single Card Spotlight

    Perished probably offers more opportunity late game if you have any type of aristocrats loop setup, as it can power up real fast to late(r) game relevance.
Top