General [ECL] Lorwyn Eclipsed



Why can't they print that in paper ffs

I get that there are some impracticalities to doing so, but I wish when they realized that, yes, if you make Magic cards, they should be available to players. Period! While I thought the outrage towards mechanically unique box toppers and Secret Lairs was silly, those aren't a fraction as anti-player as these. I'm not asking for legality in Legacy or Commander, I'm just asking for the Mystery Booster 2 treatment where there is a printing.

Who do Alchemy cards benefit? Arena players by-and-large prefer proper Magic cards and formats that have a 1:1 equivalent with real-life, as both the first-party data and that I'm able to suss out have represented time and time again. There's "novelty" in digital only cards, but it's fundamentally just self gratification for designers doing it because they can, which is fine I guess for the sake of exploring new areas of design, but they don't really do that any more. The digital-only mechanics that are hardest to capture in paper are the least compelling, and the designs have become closer and closer to what's printed in real-life every new expansion, as evidenced here.

I understand these are developed much later than the main set, and done so with the hindsight of the set's design to support them. Great! Print them a set or two later, exclusively in promo packs to encourage in-store play. Or make them a recurring Secret Lair that no one feels compelled to buy unless they're in for it. Or have them show up in Collector Boosters on rare occasion. Magic has so many product releases that I find it unfathomable that they can't find one to slip this in.
 
I'm gonna prox it up. I think it might be a perfect occasional for my cube, a buildaround that makes for unique decks. Drafted this pretending I had Providence of Night to see how viable it is:










Sweet little mardu blink/sac deck that basically only splashes red because you need to be in a wedge to cast Providence, but it doesn't look too different from a regular version – yet I could easily get 8 spells to copy, with even 2 more in the sb.
 


Why can't they print that in paper ffs
Pisses me off when they do literal paper cards as digital. Even cards that are easy to convert is annoying. Save the digital designs for digital cards. Limitless Rekindling gets the digital-only idea right.

Hell, this card's Commander bait and they didn't even put it in paper.
 

I get why this one can't see print, but this would actually be pretty easy to play in person if you brought some spare Goatnap's. You could even rewrite it to use 'Goat' counters like Omo, Queen of Vesuva's 'everything' counters, but I think it's clearer without that.

What a cool card though! It can't do anything the turn it comes down, but threatening to steal your opponents best creature every turn and head butt them with it is strong.

I like the flexibility he has of either making your opponents creature's goats to hit back with them harder, or goat your own creatures to discount all your spells (including the goatnap).

There's even a secret mode here where he goats himself and then you goatnap him to untap and hit for 6 on an empty board.

And since {B/R} is usually big on sacrifice, there's all kind of synergy here that will just let him kill a creature each cycle.
 
There's "novelty" in digital only cards, but it's fundamentally just self gratification for designers doing it because they can, which is fine I guess for the sake of exploring new areas of design, but they don't really do that any more.

As someone who used to play Hearthstone a bit, I feel like most of the Alchemy cards are very generic "we have digital cards now I guess" designs vs. things that actually leverage Magic's more distinctive mechanics or do wacky things with set mechanics. I guess we got the Mapping the Maze cycle and the travesties that were the Specialize cards?
 
I'm a bit sad about all the sweet mechanics they decided not to revisit for this set in full scale: retrace, persist, conspire and of course evoke all would've liked some new represantatives.
 
Top