WOTC seems to keep pumping out all sorts of super cool 1-3 drops, but other than Doomskar I haven't seen too many fun control tools from recent sets. Which cards am I missing?
You'd probably run a 4U 3/3 flash flying ETB: draw a card even if it had no other text, right?
Either mode could be the finisher depending on the matchup. Against a midrange deck, the a control player could slam the typhoon hardcast, and then make a stream of sharks from every subsequent removal spell, cantrip, and planeswalker they play. It's a decent follow up to a board wipe, to be sure.I think its role as a finisher is that cycling mode.
Shark Typhoon is an awesome design, but I'm curious how many non-creature spells get cast after the 6 mana mark in average games? I'd have to see it playing to evaluate it in that regard. It's a finisher that wants you to also be playing as many spells with as high a cost as possible after putting down the finisher. Compares pretty cleanly to Rise from the Tides, which operates basically the opposite.
The cycling mode is awesome though. X/X flash+flying+cantrip is a beating
The number of non-creature spells that get cast after playing the typhoon in enchantment mode can vary. It depends on the structure of control decks in the environment, and the density of cantrips, removal, and Planeswalkers compared to creatures. I would say one is likely to make at least 5 mana's worth of Sharks after playing the Typhoon as a bare minimum, usually only reaching this low threshold in games where the Typhoon is coming down really late and isn't the only finisher present. A more realistic case is somewhere between 7 and 12 mana's worth of sharks.If that is the case that's fine, it's decent in the cycling mode. Just isn't outstandingly cool, interesting, or fun in that mode, so I assumed TGT was meaning the main effect.
Also competes against cards like Sphinx of uthuun if that's all we run it for, which tradeoff the flexibility and flash for the ability to be reanimated and a much stronger draw clause (fact or fiction vs. peek targeting yourself).