Here's the example I always pull.
Pretend you want to search for all the cards that reference +1/+1 counters and dying, or have prowess, using the advanced search, how would you do this?
IMO: ("+1/+1 counter" dies) or prowess (go ahead, copy paste it into the Oracle text search field here https://scryfall.com/advanced)
When the advance search parses this, you get this page: https://scryfall.com/search?as=grid&order=name&q=(o:("+1/+1+o:counter"+o:dies)+o:or+o:prowess)
Which means they searched (o"+1/+1 o:counter" o:dies) o:or orowess) . This is very wrong, and fairly easy to fix.
However, I've brought this up three times to various group and gotten the following answers:
1. The UI is better than MCI's was.
2. The search is not broken, you need to search (o:"+1/+1 counter" o:dies) or orowess.
3. Yeah but MCI also had issues.
:/
Pretend you want to search for all the cards that reference +1/+1 counters and dying, or have prowess, using the advanced search, how would you do this?
IMO: ("+1/+1 counter" dies) or prowess (go ahead, copy paste it into the Oracle text search field here https://scryfall.com/advanced)
When the advance search parses this, you get this page: https://scryfall.com/search?as=grid&order=name&q=(o:("+1/+1+o:counter"+o:dies)+o:or+o:prowess)
Which means they searched (o"+1/+1 o:counter" o:dies) o:or orowess) . This is very wrong, and fairly easy to fix.
However, I've brought this up three times to various group and gotten the following answers:
1. The UI is better than MCI's was.
2. The search is not broken, you need to search (o:"+1/+1 counter" o:dies) or orowess.
3. Yeah but MCI also had issues.
:/