Dom Harvey
Contributor
I don't see why Barrens vs the Thicket cycle is the comparison rather than Barrens vs Terramorphic Expanse. They do very different things. Does Satyr Wayfinder 'obliterate' Impulse?
It's not unequivocally better though! Ash Barrens is always a mana source. Cycling lands are a [CIPT land/random card] split card. The whole appeal of cycling lands is that they fight both mana screw and mana flood.
I completely missed that that was the original argument, I merely responded to your statement that Ash Barrens completely obliterates the old cycle lands. My gut response to your side of the argument was basically...I'm still puzzled over how my off handed remark has gone this far. Ash Barrens is a better card! That's it! If I had to choose one cycling land (the original argument), I'd be more likely to choose Barrens.
That was my angle, and that's why it didn't make much sense to me that you were trying to prove Ash Barrens is the better cards. It does different things, that's all I was pointing out as well. Also, I still feel the old cyclers are more interesting for the synergies they have with different kinds of cards, but yes, if you are going to include a single card in your BLB to help mana fixing, of course Ash Barrens is the pick!I don't see why Barrens vs the Thicket cycle is the comparison rather than Barrens vs Terramorphic Expanse. They do very different things. Does Satyr Wayfinder 'obliterate' Impulse?
I think the cost ones are the best for the BLB cuz they can mitigate both flood and color screw.
RTL, myself included, went nuts???
I kind of want to make a rule that all basic lands have cycling to see what it would be like.
tbh it was the use of 'obliterated'
why not 'jokulhaups'd'
(cf. "YOU JUST GOT JOKULHAUPS'D M8")
So asking here 6 months later.. how did it go?
Question to all:
How many of each Basic land do you usually run in your cube? (Let's assume 8 players)
My guess would be in the area of 20 of each Basic land type.