Search results

Actually, another thing I really want is more good playable golems and splicers! There's some fun splicers, but not as many "incidental golems" as I'd love

I've heard it was printed as an answer to the bounce spells played by the delver of secrets decks at the time

Thragtusk was the bane of my existence back in innistrad - return to ravnica standard when I played white weenie but, it's a good sweet midrange card. 5 life and 2 bodies is pretty good of one card though

You jest, but I believe there was a (fringe) pauper deck called "acid trip" that was based on this exact 2-card combo

Yeah I'm down for more flashback cards always

Brb I'm adding both wall of frost and wall of nets to support "UW No Combat Allowed"

Labyrinth Minotaur I wanna give a shout out to this goofy guy from Homelands that I played yesterday in a chaos draft in a UW flyers deck. I'm pretty sure it's straight up worse than wall of frost, but he helped me navigate to a 2-1 finish (so, not great lol).

Am I crazy or is this page listing every card twice?

Sorry for being silly but, "mown"? Like mowing a lawn ?

Jokes on you I only run bad cards! More specifically I'm trying to explore how to get a "5 color artifact (kinda) matters" going. Being able to incidentally sacrifice a clue or food token sounds really fun.

This seems like a straight upgrade over vicious offering ?

Haha I love the implication that he can only kind of, "jump" instead of properly fly.

Livaan, Cultist of Tiamat Man, what a cool card. I keep missing out on a bunch of sweet cube cards in command sets.

I agree! It really feels like the current designers are a big fan of the game they're designing for.

Honestly bafeld at how cool this commander set is

Really cool white card! I like the "mini-batallion: draw a card" and the ability to turn lands (or any other dead card) into 2/2s. More riot stuff, and also +1/+1 counter tribal. Is it any good in 1v1? Don't really know! Maybe in some GR +1/+1 Midrange deck? Edit: lol didn't realize both...

Hm, too bad they didn't make battles that say "when this battle is defeated, sacrifice it and do X". I think that would've made me like them much more, now they have to flip before they can give you the reward.

I suppose that's true. I just am bummed by sometimes having to disregard a card because it uses one of these "poisonous" mechanics. But that is a very cube specific concern of course, I understand the sets are designed for many different kinds of play.

I will say this; there seems to be an increasing trend of having a set introduce a gimmick permanent and frequently make reference to it in the abilities of creatures in the set. Things care explicitly for treasures, or care explicitly about powerstones, or mention battles explicitly. It leads...

What a cool website