Search results

It does not have to be mono-coloured. Just make each basic land produce all colours without drawback. Great idea from a design perspective.

Or having both the pain lands and the gain lands/temples in the basic box. Use the lands in the cube for something spicy

Sharpie?

greater good Birthing pod

How can you guarantee that every colour pair has an equal amount of lands? That is only possible if you either seed in some boosters more than 1 or the number of boosters is a multiple of the number of pairs you have. I like the fighting over the fixing, but not all players value lands correctly.

Seeding is a great idea! Still, would it not be simpler to have them in the basic land box? Allow each player to take: 2 tri coloured lands 3/4 dual coloured lands (not more than 3/2 of each colour combination) 3/4 evolving wilds/ prismatic vista type of lands You lose the fighting over the...

It could also be a land as permanent without a mana ability. Or a new permanent type, or allow a permanent without a type. What is wrong with a typeless permanent? Simply tacking on an enchantment seems tacky. For the gods I get it, they were from another plane. The sleepers not so much.

I meant why they should be enchantments, that part seems a tad weird (given the old flavour of enchantments). My point of the post was that there have been exceptions to the old flavour of enchantments since a long time. The problem with (flavour) restrictions is that they restrict what cards...

Because the flavour was that enchantments changed permanents in play/ the rules of the game. It is hard to hit someone with an illusion(or how should I name it?)/buff or something like that but you can make the illusion such that you hit yourself. Artifacts on the other hand are perfectly...

Thanks, I was confused with conjure to your hand.

Do you really want them in different sleeves? Seems weird with conjure into your library or brainstorm type of effects.

Well, argothian enchantress Rancor Fortitude Endless wurm Barron, master wizard Smokestack

Except in the case when you want to reanimate, then the draw can be important. Furthermore, a bit later in the game you do not have a land drop to use out of your hand and then the tusker is (except the trample part) better.

Tanuki does not draw though…

Not the board stalls I have encountered. It is rarely that one player has removal left since it is used against utility or evasive creatures. Furthermore, a trampler is quite hard to deal with, so a 36/36 trample is often a must answer or die in one or 2 turns. My cube has phyrexian processor...

Tough one. Tanuki properly ramps but does not draw a card. So what do you value more and happens more often? If you cycle tusker when you often do not have a land in your hand than tusker is likely better. That said, the tusker can be clumped all day long… why not both?

And hexproof/ward makes it together with trample a I win card… If you can make it big, the opponent has likely not got any removal left. Give them one topdeck to find it!

The question was best, not the most fun :edh:

Get well!

Persist and undying cards? (Sadly it is not on enchantments) dark depths Smokestack Aether vial