chandra's ignition
Speaking of which, how close is this to a win more bonfire for durdly midrange decks? I want to try it out just to give a nudge to big red decks but, it might be a bit too dumb.
Black and blue coincidentally also has some really good one-two cmc non-creature spells. So it still has room for just the good stuff. I'm intrigued by the idea, if it's doable it seems to glue together a hole on a really sleek way.
I think the trick to support aggressive decks with CIPT lands is to be aware that the entire format should be based around that. We've had fixing that is CIPT in retail and those formats have had aggressive decks so that CIPT means no more aggro is in my opinion just a cubing myth. I also...
I agree on this distinction. A control deck shouldn't be able to win a top deck war like a midrange deck can. Are there white cards that help generate CA and locks down the game then that is probably better suggestions than raw power.
Maybe stuff like tappers isn't that bad of an idea? Oor are...
Land destruction and bounce lands sounds like such a feelbad nonbo for the environment. I also think you should switch the guild gates for either scrylands and or gainlands!
I won one from a draft and thought nothing of it, cut to two months ahead and I just traded that guy for like a deathrite shaman, noble hierarch, thoughseize and a bunch of other stuff. That price sky rockeded.
So what about those high toughness two drops for blue?
frostburn weird
ludevic's test subject
fog bank
omenspeaker
sigiled starfish
some of this feels pretty janky though