Search results

Not being able to tap artifacts and (mostly) lands is a huge relevant difference.

I say we table this discussion for now because it's kind of distracting. If you want to make a custom card that is Courser sans Enchantment type, cool. I'd just run Courser for player familiarity, and out cubes would play identically. I am not against the idea of an enchantment subtheme, but I'd...

Kinda funny they were printed in the same set. I wonder how often Soul is getting activated in practice. 5-mana is okay if used proactively (on your combat step) but feels like a ton to keep open if you're not already ahead on board.

It's mostly that users here predominantly started with power-max-ish cubes, thought to themselves "I need to change some aspects of this" and ended up with "Riplabby" cubes, which still share ~70% cards with your standard issue 360 power-max. The 30% makes it play substantially differently, but...

Oops. Actually "Ajani Gold" is rather ambiguous, card-wise.

"Come on guys, it's like a bad Ajani Gold whose effects are non-permanent that you have to keep pumping mana into!"

The main difference is in rules text. I don't assume a set has a Goblin subtheme just because I see a creature with subtype Goblin. I assume it when I see Goblin Grenade or a card that says "Goblin creatures you control get +1/+1".

I do run her. She's got a partial in my poly and a fullsi in Eldrazi. Also I just like making posts that consist solely of Rosheen Meanderer images.

I would agree with you 100% if we were talking about creating a custom card and randomly making it an enchantment creature for no reason. I don't know, I never open Shardless Agent or that 2W Phyrexian Mana guy and assume there's an artifact theme in said cube (nor do I assume there is an...

Rosheen Meanderer

Oh, it only puts one of them onto the field. I'm dumb again. Carry on. This card is really challenging my literacy.

Uh my bad: Totally didn't realize this triggered on casting. Is this a card? Genesis Wave was almost a card, and this seems way sweeter.

Every deck has ways to work around a 4/4 groundpounder but I imagine if you're drafting blue every time you might have a biased opinion.

Let's be real here: you add more complexity by making changes to an existing card. I don't think it's super relevant to the discussion, but anybody who would play this would be familiar with normal Magic. Reprints give them a foothold. I expect 0 players to be like "why is there an enchantment...

Why can't we have a dude that's incidentally an enchantment creature?

Unlikely. Especially with Theros so fresh I'd want to go in a new direction.

I don't know what you're asking.

I'd rather just run straight-up Courser, I think. Complexity will be a real concern for such a project.

Intersection between life loss and Storm: Phyrexian mana.

I also love Cascade and Domain. Can we do non-poisonous Storm cards?!?!?