Search results

boom // bust @Grillo_Parlante @Sheltem

Are we bumping old CML threads now?

I'm still here sometimes. This reminds me that I have a CML email to answer. Also, I agree with 2013 Jason.

You see them rolling and you're hating?

I feel like you're saying one thing but meaning another.

I would make it a destructible creature without all the devotion activation nonsense with more middling stats, if I had to redesign the card.

I'm tired and thought Ebony Fly said 'roll a d20'.

I just... normally don't get that excited about core sets, so my expectations weren't that high to begin. I'm reasonably optimistic about it as a draft set, but it's hard to give a proper verdict on some of these (dungeons, d20) until I've played with them.

Apparently Spare Supplies is a hit in Pauper.

Personally I'm not wild on paying 4 mana and 4 life for my first divination in environments beyond retail. I think it's strong in the best case scenario, but even in Penny Pincher turns were often too constrained to crack clues, much less pay 2 life for the privilege to do so.

I run both the cards you mention and have been very happy with the role they fill, but if I had to pick one for my cube I'd pick Falkenrath.

Somebody should remake Damn as an Underload card.

And once you breathe out forests it's like... of course you live in the forest.

To be honest I quite like it as written.

Are you not a fan of the dream?

I don't really know anything about this, I just like it when other people have opinions.

It's also possible that Standard with Runechanters Pike completely distorted my view of Haunt.

I mostly agree, but I've also 3-0d with decks whose entire game plan was Primeval Titan into Volrath's Stronghold, or full control decks that mostly win off of Nephalia Drownyard in lieu of developing their own threats.

To me the question is 'how many creatures do you need your land to create to be worth it'. You can run a pretty creature-light deck and still make several tokens from the land.