Grillo_Parlante
Contributor
But it is only a bad sign for the health of the game if you consider that competitive Magic is the best way for it to be represented, which might not be the case anymore. I agree that they need a presence there, but I disagree with how much presence they actually need. Having an actual experience related to an event might be much more in line with their new direction.
Think of the Markov Manor/Geralf's Lab/Abbey escape the room thing they had to promote SoI, for instance. That seemed to be super interesting and reaches a far greater group of people than just the PT competitive experience ever would. And personally, while I disagree with the sloppy execution of how they are phasing out competitive play, I agree with their quarterly marketing events to be more celebration of the game, than bring celebrations of the most optimal way to play the game.
Its not a question of whats the best or worst way of being represented: its being ran off your demographic because you can't compete with your competitors due to missing the market shift towards digital platforms.
I don't know anything nor care about the escape room you mentioned, but I did pay attention to the innovative gb control deck whose tech we've brewed about here: a deck that probably wouldn't exist without the money incentive to develop for pro events.