View attachment 3226
Why is wizards doing this stuff?
There is no creativity in pushing these cards
What is the gain of this? Was standard never fun without these?
My biggest complain is that hilariously pushed cards totally ruin limited games. This one at least dies to removal, but id you can't kill a 6 toughness beater right away you'll lose
Meanwhile...
"See the Truth"
Sorcery
Look at the top three cards of your library. Put one of those cards into your hand, and the rest on the bottom of your library in a random order. If you cast this spell from anywhere besides your hand, instead put all three cards into your hand.
This is probably Anticipate most of the time, but when it's not it is spicy indeed.
View attachment 3226
Why is wizards doing this stuff?
There is no creativity in pushing these cards
What is the gain of this? Was standard never fun without these?
My biggest complain is that hilariously pushed cards totally ruin limited games. This one at least dies to removal, but id you can't kill a 6 toughness beater right away you'll lose
now that's a strong goblin dark-dwellers target. Also really good with the red exile-"draw" effect.
View attachment 3226
Why is wizards doing this stuff?
There is no creativity in pushing these cards
What is the gain of this? Was standard never fun without these?
My biggest complain is that hilariously pushed cards totally ruin limited games. This one at least dies to removal, but id you can't kill a 6 toughness beater right away you'll lose
"It's really fun to play with cards that are a little bit expensive that involve investment and risk.
Baneslayer Angel gets brought up a lot as that kind of card - sometimes you play it and you run away with the
game - your opponent can't kill it and you're coasting. Sometimes what happens is they kill it and you're actually behind - they used a Doom Blade and cast a Divination. The range on the card going anywhere from bad (because it lost value on the way) to 'I won the game' and all the things that happen in the middle - that's really good, that's really replayable... Ravenous Chupacabra is the exact type of card that makes sure Baneslayers can't show up in decks and Standard is already too long on the Baneslayers not being good enough to play in decks... wouldn't it be cool if [Azor, the Lawbringer] was good enough to play? You play it and cross your fingers hoping to untap and if I untap it's awesome and if my opponent has a particular answer it's actively bad for me. That's drama and tension in gameplay. Instead, of course I'm playing with Torrential Gearhulk. I'm not going to commit something to the table on my main phase that requires me to tap out and doesn't generate immediate value. Why would I ever do that? I really wish we were sculpting a world where things like [Azor] were the finisher you wanted and not Torrential Gearhulk"
My gut says no, but 1 mana is a lot better than 2.
IIRC from last time I checked I kinda wanted "Sacrifice a creature or pay 2" like effect, since it was just dead a decent amount of the time, even with aristocrats as the archetype of choice
Absolutely, the card just still might not be worth playingIsn't it a lot easier to cast this in response to removal if you a deck with several bodies? 2 mana is much harder to keep up.