Today's already been pretty interesting.
First, we got
9 cards from the upcoming 2027 "
Battle of Five Armies Co-Op Kit", the new Bilbo of which seems to imply that a "battle" box set will be our first return to the battle card type since MOM came out 3 years ago. That's interesting. Less interesting but still notable is the new Azorious bomb:
Bard, Heir of Girion is very boring. When we asked for simpler cards to allow the complexity of the game to come from their interactions, this isn't really what we meant, but it's a compelling design all the same. I thought
Bard's Company was worthy of Cube consideration as well, but this kind of shows what it was missing in terms of stats.
It generally draws you an extra card every turn and pumps your team, attacking and blocking like a champ all the while in a way that's rare for UW. My issue is that I like my gold cards to say something about what the color pair is trying to do, or be a goal to work towards. Yeah, this is better in a go-wide token deck, but hardly so.
Firemane Commando does a much better job at communicating that, and even that felt a little too "here you go, commander players". There's no real synergy here. It's just
good.
I don't hate it, but it certainly doesn't spark joy.
Fíli the Pathfinder seems like a great card, reminds me of
Dion, Bahamut's Dominant and
Splinter & Leo, Father & Son, in that it's a pushed
Gallant Cavalry variant that feels appropriate for a rare. It's totally fine even without any other dwarves going on.
Mighty Mutanimals has recently shown that this kind of effect is reasonable at even more competitive power levels, too. These days, I prefer something like Fili to a card that needs to get an attack in to generate tokens like
Myrel, Shield of Argive,
Hero of Bladehold, or
Leonin Warleader.
That said, my issues are three-fold: 1) I'm already happy enough with Dion...though I can't pretend I wouldn't mind replacing him with a non-DFC card), 2) as much as I like the way "storied" would play out in my Cube, I don't like bad tracking mechanics like this, and 3) it implies that dwarves-matter is something that's happening in my Cube. I think my annoyances with this guy are just slightly more than that of Dion, but who knows, maybe I'll swap the two at some point.
"Think Thrice" indeed!
Plunder the Trollshaws is such a lovely Cube card, and I imagine it'll be one of the set's most popular cards on these boards. I like this more than
Deep Analysis,
Memory Deluge,
Secrets of the Key, or
Start the TARDIS, but to be fair, all of those cards, as well as
Think Twice, are currently in my on-deck binder, not in my Cube. Still, I would love to make room for this one.
Confusticate and Bebother is a side grade to
Confounding Riddle, a solid tier 2.5 counterspell for large Cubes like mine. If you're in my shoes (someone already playing Riddle), I think this is going to be more a decision of which art you prefer, as I'm more or less equally happy with their draw effects. I like that it's a common!
Balin, Loremaster is another personal gripe of mine thanks to
storied showing up on a card that makes a ton of sense for my Cube. Treating this as the only dwarf, how much better or worse is it than long-time-favorite-but-current-bench-warmer
Bedlam Reveler? It's about the same, in my Cube at least. It tells players to play legends and artifacts instead of instants or sorceries, but I find that to be much more common/less competitive in my list. I like that it'll generally ping your opponent for a few damage, but it's probably not worth all the extra text just to do that unless you do have a few more dwarves running around.