Search results

yeah it's not going to be an issue lol

ok nice! Weird to me that they would use two different card texts, but my annoyance is (somewhat) sated.

Don't see why color count would matter. There are 5 color commanders already, so its not like giving a partner deck access to 5 colors is unprecedented. They could've just appropriately tuned her abilities for the mechanic. Like it affects me very, very, very little, its just grating to me...

"friends forever" makes me more annoyed than it probably should. They really couldn't use partner?

Beast Within is quite the removal spell... but yes these two are very, very good. I don't count dromoka's command as a mono-green removal spell typically lol.

diligent farmhand 8 or so copies of course ;)

Did not even notice that. That's hilarious.

Werewolves also subsist on diets that rely on food that relies on sunlight.... Full scale ecological extinction is not sustainable for any predator. That was like one of Sorin's whole shticks. The proverbial hunting licenses etc.

Stormbind

"You might be able to close the can, but where did the worms go?" new multipurpose saying to slaughter opponents in a debate with 2K21.

Braids has always worked out great as a creature version of the 'stack. The less interactable permanent type combined with the ability to scale up has always turned me off from Smokestack.

Claw of the Burning Tree also has haste (and an undefined mana cost. could be 1RG for all we know lol)

https://luckypaper.co/podcast/68/ :pogchimp:

Slaying fire is a decent incentive for red heavy decks, but yeah they didn't even make one rare with it...

B sound fun. I might pick B even if the dual weren't Ewilds fetchable.

Its written the way Chris mentioned. This way there is tension between targeting your own creature for heroic or something, and targeting your opponents creatures to remove them from combat that turn.

You can't make 3/1 blockers with the effect because the creatures targeted cant block ;)

I see it being a real hit on BTP though

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=based

I think I will anyways :p. Based on all the math tossed around above I see it as a robust number of dual land fixing sources for many formats. Can different amounts work? Of course, but if you are starting from a blank piece of paper, 50 is a solid choice for dual land count. It's a generalized...