Search results

I don't mind the 001/001 one ring at all. There are plenty of one rings available, there's just this one fancy version that is ultra rare. Now what that shouldn't do is drive up the price of collector's boosters, because it's almost literally a one in a million chance to pull it. Yet here we...

If you use a local copy of CardConurer to create your cards, you can use {fontsize-11} on the type line, and it should fit these card types exactly, along with an expansion symbol. I agree with @Rusje. At the very least you want to move Prismatic to the top. As an ability it should definitely...

Note to self: I might want to revisit Mathas. I think he could be a scaling card, in the sense that his power scales with the power level of the cube. Mine is definitely lower power than yours, but Mathas could be a good fit! PS. Time and again, the brutal impact of Fervent Charge keeps...

Exactly. To be fair, the Jace deck is less boring than I make it sound. It also plays Ancient Tomb, Crystal Vein, City of Traitors, Saprazzan Skerry, and Syvelunite Temple to combo out a turn (or two) earlier! You can mulligan pretty aggressively with the deck too!

Not me, and it doesn't look particularly appealing when people are brainstorming Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler + Entomb, Narset, Parter of Veils + Timetwister, and Jace, Wielder of Mysteries + Treasure Hunt (and 58 Islands) builds.

See, I wasn't far off with my odds. Two times nothing is still nothing :P

Dumpster-diving has never come with better prospects for Magic players than it does these days! :D

Like, the entire draft?! That must have been a fast deck if you 6-0'd with an average of 2.3 lands in play! :P

I don't know, but buying one pack would probably double your odds!

Not the adventurous variant, yet.

I think that if you make it to 9 mana, you deserve to play a haymaker. My main concern with Mindslaver designs is recursion. It's really not a fun experience on the other side of the table when you don't get to play Magic because your opponent is playing Magic for you. As an alternate design...

I literally had white Remand in mind for my color-shifted slightly altered set that I designed those enchantment cards for this week XD

YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES!

This is a nice way of looking at it, and to be fair, with cards like Wedding Ring and Replicating Ring in the recent past, I shouldn't be too surprised.

How did they make it not an equipment...

Insert D'oh! meme here XD I read that as your opinion instead of an extension of Train's definition! I see where my interpretation went wrong there :D

Ok, your use of "neither enchantress" (meaning "none of the enchantresses") threw me off. The way you wrote it made it look like you think the Argothian Enchantress and Sythis both are bosses, not leaders :)

I'm pretty sure Sythis, Harvest's Hand is a leader, because she's an enchantment herself. To look at it another way, Sythis triggers Argothian Enchantress, but the Enchantress doesn't trigger Sythis.

What do you think, is this better?

I think you misinterpreted the original post? Or maybe I did? It was my impression that Third-Path Iconoclast and Emry, Lurker of the Loch are both bosses, because they ask you to commit to a theme they do not themselves contribute to. The difference is clearer in the case of the boss Argothian...