Search results

Ok, noted. Can you state why?

Riptide represent!

No I think you just slipped through the cracks. I didn't see your comment!

To be clear, I meant that the statement was vacuous, not you ;) To me it was like stating "The french team is really bad", where there's some important context missing. I think I can agree with you somewhat that slower decks probably are going to enjoy gold cards more, although I'd stick to...

You're paying 5 in total but you don't play it on turn 5 the earliest, though.

Hm yeah, that it happens at the upkeep does mean your opponent get's the ETB first.

Wait what's wrong with End Hostilities? Also please don't run Doomskar it's a turn 3 wipe lol.

From what I've seen on twitter and reddit, this B&R is encouraging news for people who want to play competitive mtg.

Hmm even without the lifegain I think Day of Judgement is better. One more mana isn't one turn later strictly, because you have to actually draw the lands, so in actuality it's sometimes going to be played on turn 5-6? I think that gives more room for aggro to breath.

"Boros is not an aggro guild" is to me a completely vacuous statement, it doesn't make sense unless we're talking about a specific draft environment.

Yeah that crystal dude is pretty excellent! I also count 10 different tokens.

Calamity Bearer Aegar, the Freezing Flame I double strike 3/4 is fine, but it pairs pretty well with some other giants that you'd probably be able to run! Bonecrusher Giant Cloudgoat Ranger Thryx, the Sudden Storm Frost Titan Inferno Titan Beanstalk Giant Kroxa, Titan of Death's Hunger...

Yeah, I really wish they could've made the indestructible more conditional. Maybe it could be indestructible as a creature but not in "enchantment mode"? A lot of interaction that's not possible otherwise :(

My point was in relation to the "+2/+2", which you'd ordinarily use in combat, whereas the plain "get hexproof/indestructible" effect is probably going to be most serviceable as a response to an opponent playing a spell or ability. Pairing growth and indestructible is in my opinion more powerful...

I just think that if we had a card that said "Target creature gains hexproof until end of turn" and a card that aid "Target creature gains indestructible until end of turn" I think the hexproof one is more versatile? It's not a hill I'm going to die on.

I'm on team ravnic here. Aren't we almost always duct taping together really disparate cards into a deck when drafting cube anyway? Like, for the most part cubes will contain a lot of different mechanics and effects that in their original environment was part of a "thing" (like revolt, for...

journey to nowhere banishing light faith's fetters I dunno, white does play a lot of enchantment based removal. And a 2/2 for two often blocks just fine!

I'm not sure that's a fair comparison, because combat is the specific situation where indestructible is a lot better than hexproof and these two are both combat tricks.

Yeah, husk seems good to me too since it's "kind of" has multiple modes? Weenie dork early and an equipment to put on an evasive creature later.

Hexproof helps against bounce spells as well as act of treason effects beyond just plain removal so I definitely think hexproof is better than indestructible with protection being the best.