You could probably stitch them together and get autocompletion + automatic translation from Spanish to English
From what I get from the code,
Python 3 and Python 2.X are both "current" versions of python and do not overwrite each other, so this is to double check you have (and are using) the right version of the compiler before you run it.
Well take heart! The bar has been set and it is REAL low
Do not worry and do not question your evaluation abilities. It all depends on the environment whether a card is good or not. It is entirely possible to have a low powered environment with very high powered cards. It is harder, but not impossible to have seemingly weak cards in a high powered environment.
I think part of the problem is that most people don't necessarily have experience building and balancing Cubes that aren't derivative of MTGO Cubes. If your entire perception of what a "Cube" constitutes is derived from seeing gameplay from one Cube and maybe examining some random Cube lists designed by major content creators, you're unlikely to have the skills necessary to build a cool Cube that has a balanced power band. It takes a while to learn how to get this stuff right, and most random lists you'll see on CubeCobra were designed by people who are still in the process of figuring it all out.
This is kind of crazy to look at, but the high power cards do need some support to truly be busted. That kind of support is probably lacking, given the rest of the environment. Still, there's a few of those cards that I personally wouldn't touch in any circumstance. Can't you just make the 10,000th INN or RAV cube? SMH my head...Do not worry and do not question your evaluation abilities. It all depends on the environment whether a card is good or not. It is entirely possible to have a low powered environment with very high powered cards. It is harder, but not impossible to have seemingly weak cards in a high powered environment.
My cube has weak creatures, (almost) no fast mana, but still has several high powered cards:
vs
It works since almost all of these strong cards do not win the game on their own, or are as strong as the other cards in your environment. You will win with the weak creatures.
The idea started from a desire to run Eldrazi (replaced by big artifacts) combined with the recent depth of artifact toys. From there, I followed a DMU-like design philosophy.
Well, let’s split it into some parts:
Correct. The INN and RAV thing is so overdone. I'm sure there's other Urza's people out there, but yours is the only one I've seen.In brad's defense I think the "SMH my head" was sarcastic, especially since that unpacks to "Shake my head my head"
This is kinda true. There's definitely a bit of a power difference, but it's not nearly like it is today. I think some of that can be credited to WotC's poor card evaluation at the time. That's how the Academy land cycle ended up so lopsided. Mythics of today are primarily printed to sell packs, as well. They have to be pushed well above the rest, although a reject mythic draft would be a lot of fun lol.
Echo's so weird.
Do not need an environment to shine, however they do need an environment to prevent them to become powerhouses. Well, echo is a bitch. It hurts to pay the echo of the hermit and then get shocked. Similarly, stealing an echo creature implies you have to pay the echo (even when that cost has been paid by its owner already). So it often turns into a destroy. As an extreme example of comparing a card to the rest of the environment: molting harpy is a good card when there are no other flying creatures. Similar points hold for plummet disenchant
I've done the same. I found that the decks of that time weren't supported for a draft environment as well as I'd hoped and I ended up scrapping the project. So many of the decks then were named after a card, so you'd have to break singleton in order to force those decks to exist.
Where's the sadface reaction? :'''(
I don't know, but the same card immediately caught my eye lol.
