Card/Deck Life from the Loam

CML

Contributor
the general difficulty with loam (i'll say again) is that the big support cards are by and large poor on their own, but uh

Arbor -- utility land draft as is very bad without GSZ, Dryad Arbor IMO is a bad design (someone correct me if i'm historically wrong) as a 1/1 creature land's drawbacks otherwise grossly outweigh its benefits unless there's GSZ, in which case you always want it and also tilt the table if you draw it at any point.
i think if i have a GSZ deck (cube is better with 2 GSZs!) i always want it. it's a nice thing to have in the utility land draft, though.
Crime -- the 'smoothest' inclusion
Jab -- could be interesting with young pyromancer, but ask yourself what kind of Red deck wants to pay R + throw a land to do 1 damage to something. however there are many Black decks that want to B + throw a land to RAPE THEIR HAND INTO OBLIVION!!!

i think that to include loam you need a strong graveyard team, but i also think you also need a strong graveyard theme
 

CML

Contributor
as for ranger of eos you get a nice 3/2 with the deal. you'd think this wouldn't matter, but they made some hokey ardent plea stuff and then they made a 2/2 + a spell for 1UG and it was more of a big deal. (i for one was hugely surprised by this)
 

Jason Waddell

Administrator
Staff member
Cycling lands from the Utility Land Draft are pretty great with Loam too. I think the key is having a critical mass of cards that you want in your deck anyways. I've also had good success using Loam in midrange decks to make sure I just never run out of land drops.
 

CML

Contributor
Chris: mono-colored? WWK cycle is always a blast, friend was designing enemy color manlands too.

something like

1R -- 3/1 first strike
1W -- 2/2 lifelink
1B -- 2/1 unblockable
1U -- 2/2 flying? fae conclave is pretty good already

---

i agree with jason about cycle lands and "cards you want in your deck anyway" but then the issue becomes "why would these decks want loam." a non-trivial problem, really
 
http://cubetutor.com/viewcube/5125
so uhhh
i've been brewing????????? is it brewing if you just make a cube list?
16 card packs for 8 people, i'm aiming at 384 here.

im considering printing this out

if loam isnt good in this environment then nothing good can ever happen again

what has science done? is this an awful mistake? how could i possibly make a cube that doesn't include shard phoenix?
 

Chris Taylor

Contributor
Chris: mono-colored? WWK cycle is always a blast, friend was designing enemy color manlands too.

something like

1R -- 3/1 first strike
1W -- 2/2 lifelink
1B -- 2/1 unblockable
1U -- 2/2 flying? fae conclave is pretty good already

---

i agree with jason about cycle lands and "cards you want in your deck anyway" but then the issue becomes "why would these decks want loam." a non-trivial problem, really

I too like faerie conclave.
Red: could probably be a stormblood berserker type guy. I'm thinkin {R}{2} to activate, since green should probably get the big creature.
White: I like lifelink better in black actually. Maybe youthful knight, then black gets child of night?
 

James Stevenson

Steamflogger Boss
Staff member
what we should have is a land that turns into a planeswalker that comes into play with more loyalty counters if you dealt damage to an opponent this turn. Then ultimate would allow you to sideboard with your library during that game. And maybe it could shuffle in so you could side it out.
I have no idea why I'm writing this.
 
http://cubetutor.com/viewcube/5125
so uhhh
i've been brewing????????? is it brewing if you just make a cube list?
16 card packs for 8 people, i'm aiming at 384 here.

im considering printing this out

if loam isnt good in this environment then nothing good can ever happen again

what has science done? is this an awful mistake? how could i possibly make a cube that doesn't include shard phoenix?

Vinelasher Kudzu is pretty sweet as a green "landfall" guy.
 
im gonna fiddle with it some more and make a proper thread in the cube list forum soon maybe, locals sounded interested in trying it once i proxy it up. i dont plan on spending the money on it because i suspect its more of a gimmick than long-term fun but hey
 

Eric Chan

Hyalopterous Lemure
Staff member
Given that I already run this batch of stuff, mainly for the {U}{B}{G} reanimator decks...



Is it worth the slots to toss in a mini-Worm Harvest package, which could allow the graveyard decks to ditch the blue filtering and uncastable fatty plan entirely, and subsist solely on green and black?



It could well be that all this stuff is crap, even in a lower-powered environment like mine. I don't know.

I know the dredge theme failed in Modern Masters, but I didn't play enough of the format to understand why exactly, though I figure the poison-principley nature of the cards had something to do with it.
 

Chris Taylor

Contributor
You know, for Worm Harvest specifically you probably do want mulch over Wayfinder, since the extra lands in hand counts for so much.
Honestly if its the cornerstone of a deck, I'd go up to 4 worm harvests, or find something similar (possibly none exist, I'll admit) just so that the drafter can easily get their hands on it.
 
Top