Yeah, this whole class of spells is cute, but a little too narrow for either constructed or cube.
![](%3D)
I almost feel like Turn Aside could cost
, and still be fair, because of how narrow it is.
I almost feel like Turn Aside could cost
That interestingly enough might make it broad enough for my purposes.well intervene counters opponent's auras or whatever too i guess
Is this at all feasible? The effect is stellar, but the cost, mama mia!
For clearer wording:
![]()
Sac 4 creatures for a Koth ultimate... hmmm...
Yes, but this time you're not paying 6 life, and the card is a lot harder to remove. You could also, conceivably, use Hecatomb as a 6-mana Arc Lightning. Eh, four creature is a lot lot lot though.
I don't think I've ever not run Hell's Thunder. Play it, sac it. I think it's an auto-include if you're going to run sac-themes.
Gerrard's Verdict is fine, but you won't miss it. I liked the decisions it made when I ran the lifegain theme, but outside of that it's not that essential.
I didn't know that theme was gone! It was super techie and awesome. What happened?
I forgot I wanted to mention that frenzied goblin can be decent in an environment where you have a density of (preferably slower) things that want to connect for value
![]()
I actually like it, despite Eric thinking I don't. It was mostly a size problem. I had to cut into the sacrifice theme to get the lifegain theme to work, and then the sacrifice theme wasn't performing as I'd like. It was pretty fun to play and had an interesting range of deck options. Maybe it'll be back in some capacity someday.
I'm sure this list is somewhere already, butPossibly a sac outlet that gains you life or something silly like that...Like Zuran Orb but for creatures
Its on the list for my next update.Ajani's Pridemate is a nice target for squadroning![]()
I JUST MADE THAT CHANGE IN MY LAST UPDATE OMG HOW DID YOU KNOW!?!?!If Gnawing Zombie had that same ability for 1 mana less, he'd be amazing I imagine.
I'm sure this list is somewhere already, but
![]()