General CBS
- Thread starter James Stevenson
- Start date
I just want to say that I hate mirror entity. Dumbs down games really fast.
I still remember the first time I had someone bounce my entire board because of that card
Is Sensei's Divining Top too tedious for use on Cockatrice?
http://www.channelfireball.com/articles/woo-brews-play-the-game-see-valencia/
Sometimes you read an article and then you accidentally read the comments.
On the plus side I learned about two sweet cards.
I wonder if these can work in a cube setting...
Sometimes you read an article and then you accidentally read the comments.
On the plus side I learned about two sweet cards.
I wonder if these can work in a cube setting...
Dom Harvey
Contributor
This is what you get from people who read Travis Woo articles.
(and Magic players in general, sadly)
(and Magic players in general, sadly)
Their downsides are just so miserable for their essentially vanilla bodies... you could get them to work, sure, but you'd have to, wait for it, WEAKEN REMOVAL! (GASP NOW)
Deathrite Shaman is like, the best simultaneous mana flood / screw protection ever printed.
He's more or less a 1 mana planeswalker.
I suppose I don't need to reiterate how I feel on the topic.
morna vort
don't print this
Solring, Lord of Innistrad
+1: Addto your mana pool.
0: Add
-1: Add
1
Crypt Valut?
We'll never see their like again, but surely we'd all cube a couple more copies of grim monolith or sol ring if they could only see fit to think of new damn names for them! Then we'd just get pissed we don't have 2nd Karn or 2nd Wurmcoil. It's not like we are letting abundance of names warp our formats or anything. There is a reason we have imposed these scarcities upon ourselves.
I intend to throttle the will out of my one day children for a similar reason, it's really all I've ever known and I'm incredible defensive when it comes to criticism or change.
We'll never see their like again, but surely we'd all cube a couple more copies of grim monolith or sol ring if they could only see fit to think of new damn names for them! Then we'd just get pissed we don't have 2nd Karn or 2nd Wurmcoil. It's not like we are letting abundance of names warp our formats or anything. There is a reason we have imposed these scarcities upon ourselves.
I intend to throttle the will out of my one day children for a similar reason, it's really all I've ever known and I'm incredible defensive when it comes to criticism or change.
FlowerSunRain
Contributor
The logic is beyond me, but the motivation for even wanting to defend the logic is even less understandable. Absolutely nothing is literally the worst thing that can happen.
FlowerSunRain
Contributor
I mean, I understand fighting for the sake of fighting, but that's not what I'm talking about. I mean, say the "anti-singleton" people "win" the "argument". What happens to the singleton cubes? Assuming those cubes were well designed and the singleton restriction was impinging on their design goals (in which case they've improved their cube, so why are they complaining?), absolutely nothing. They don't have to change a single card, it literally doesn't effect them in any way.
Laz
Developer
Suppose the singleton people "win" the argument. I suspect the end result is we all sit here feeling frustrated that other people insist on imposing arbitrary rules which do naught but harm their environments. Oh wait...
I just find it strange when people become confused and disoriented at a simple comment like 'oh, I doubled up on Faithless Looting because the effect blah blah blah... '
I just find it strange when people become confused and disoriented at a simple comment like 'oh, I doubled up on Faithless Looting because the effect blah blah blah... '