General Custom Cards: The Lab

Chris Taylor

Contributor
Omigosh I really like that druid. Recently Jason talked about how "generically pickable monocolor good stuff" is healthy for a cube and that druid really fits the bill. Without being ridiculous Batterskull generically-pickable.

I am not sure how I feel about redundance being on the card.

That druid is insane btw :p
 
Thinking about playable discard. How does this rate?

{2/B}{B}{B} ; Sorcery ; Target player chooses one:
  • Discard three cards
  • Reveal two non-land cards and put them on the top of that player's library in any order
 

Onderzeeboot

Ecstatic Orb
Thinking about playable discard. How does this rate?

{2/B}{B}{B} ; Sorcery ; Target player chooses one:
  • Discard three cards
  • Reveal two non-land cards and put them on the top of that player's library in any order
I choose for you to discard three cards!

In all seriousness, you need to reword that card :)

Target opponent chooses one -
  • That player discards three cards.
  • That player reveals two nonland cards from his or her library. Put them on top of that player's library in any order.

I kinda dislike marrying the hybrid black mana with straight black mana, do you really want this to be cast at three mana?
 
A Vast Sea of Muddled Golems
Artifact Land
You may have THIS cipt. If you do, add a counter to target artifact of the same kind as a counter it already has.
T: Add 1 to your mana pool.
 

Aoret

Developer
A Vast Sea of Muddled Golems
Artifact Land
You may have THIS cipt. If you do, add a counter to target artifact of the same kind as a counter it already has.
T: Add 1 to your mana pool.


Why not just "if you do, proliferate"? Templating is much cleaner. Yes, it's more powerful that way, but probably not ridiculous. I think I'd run it in ULD written that way; I actually think this is pretty cool.
 

Chris Taylor

Contributor
Why not just "if you do, proliferate"? Templating is much cleaner. Yes, it's more powerful that way, but probably not ridiculous. I think I'd run it in ULD written that way; I actually think this is pretty cool.

Each instance of proliferate is an anthemn, remember. Might be a but much for an ETB tapped land
 
Yeah, I'm a little bit afraid of the ceiling on Proliferate, considering that artifact lands are fetchable with trinket mage and the like. But hey, it's a custom card, if the idea tickles your fancy I'd love to hear how any version of it works for you, even dialed up or down!
 

Chris Taylor

Contributor
I think adding a counter is a better one. It depends hugely on what counters can do in your enviornment, but the basement of adding a +1/+1 counter might go a long way to helping this card get noticed
 

Aoret

Developer
Each instance of proliferate is an anthemn, remember. Might be a but much for an ETB tapped land
Not sure I get what you mean CT. You talking about density of +1/+1 counter effects making it effectively an anthem? You're probably right about it just always ETBT-ing.

The +1/+1 counter version is solid too though, maybe I'll run both just for the hell of it.
 
What about Phylactery counters? I don't have any designs that aren't awful but I feel like it's an interesting design space.
 
Lich hat? Artifact equipment? I don't know. Once you have that card right there (tuned up or down to suit your cube's power level), plus some way to turn one of your other creatures into a lich, you've explored most of the design space already?
 

Onderzeeboot

Ecstatic Orb
Single-Serving Shield Spell {U}
Instant
Target tapped creature gains hexproof until it becomes untapped.
Draw a card.
Hmm... Not really elegant. Why not "Target tapped creature gains hexproof until end of turn." or, if you really need to, "until the start of your next turn."?
 
Hmm... Not really elegant. Why not "Target tapped creature gains hexproof until end of turn." or, if you really need to, "until the start of your next turn."?

Because of some blue cards and artifacts that can perma-self-tap to possess or arrest things.

Until start of next turn would probably be fine though?
 
Single-Serving Spellskin{U}
Flash Enchantment
Enchant tapped creature​
Creature has hexproof​
When enchanted creature becomes untapped, sacrifice THIS and draw a card.​
But if you're already forced to remember that a thing is staying tapped, AND affecting another thing until first thing becomes untapped, how hard is it to tack on "also untargetable during that time"? Especially because you memorably played the instant in order to fizzle your opponent's first attempt to wallop your creature?​
 
Single-Serving Spellskin{U}
Flash Enchantment
Enchant tapped creature​
Creature has hexproof​
When enchanted creature becomes untapped, sacrifice THIS and draw a card.​
But if you're already forced to remember that a thing is staying tapped, AND affecting another thing until first thing becomes untapped, how hard is it to tack on "also untargetable during that time"? Especially because you memorably played the instant in order to fizzle your opponent's first attempt to wallop your creature?​

Assume it's game two, you're at 10 life with a board presence but no hand, I'm on control and I just stabilized with a grip of answers. You're trying to work out what I've got, I'm trying to remember what you could topdeck, and maybe it's a couple turns before I want to kill your Old Man, get back my duder, and then make more profitable blocks or whatever. When I go to do that, and you stop me to point at some piece of shit cantrip in your graveyard - assuming you still remember it's there? - I will leave and not come back to play your Cube with its custom cards. This will literally harsh my vibe.

Wizards don't make cards like that for the same reason. (Riding the Dilu Horse is the rare formatting exception that's pleasant to cast)

e: and i don't think i'd ever take it outta my sideboard there's more catch-all ways to protect Rubinia so the proposition is an awkward card that's super niche
 
Haha, okay maybe the very cards that I was thinking of supporting, are bad design in the first place. Thanks for the thoughts people!
 

Aoret

Developer
At what P/T and mana cost would precursor golem be interesting enough to run? Assume a couple of pump spells in the format and a great deal of removal that makes him look stupid.
 
Is Precursor not already interesting enough? Your cube looks comparable to mine in power level, and my drafters have been happy to run Precursor even without pump.

I'm brainstorming cards for the Jund slot in my cube (the custom I have there has barely seen play). How does this look?

Spitting Thrinax {B}{G}{R}
Creature - Lizard
When ~ enters the battlefield, ~ deals 1 damage to target creature or player.
When ~ dies, return it to the battlefield under its owner's control at the beginning of the next end step.
2/1
 

Onderzeeboot

Ecstatic Orb
So strictly worse ghost quarter? o.O
I don't think it's strictly worse or better, it's an altogether different animal.

"Sacrifice ~: Destroy target nonbasic land. Its controller searches his or her library for a basic land card, reveals it, puts it into his or her hand, then shuffles his or her library."

That actually sounds like a lofty compromise between Wasteland and Ghost Quarter!
 
Top