I personally am keeping mine with the same words except for Creature-->Pokemon. I think it's a little easier to go through when the terms are the same. I'd say that's true here, as well, but that discard pile and graveyard are probably so interchangeable for a card game player that it doesn't really matter.For my custom Pokémagic cube, I've changed several terms to be ore immersive with the world of Pokémon. A sorcery is an action, an enchantment is an influence, and instead of "when this creature dies" the cards say "when this Pokémon is defeated". But here is one, I am not so sure about: Should I rename the graveyard to the more generic discard pile? While death is not completely absent in Pokémon as a topic (think Lavandia), it only plays a minor role compared to magic's fantasy worlds. And even there, they've used discard pile on some cards.
There are some cards in the cube that adress death in some way, "Lavandia Tower" and "Mourning Cubone", but also a whopping ten prehistoric Pokémon that all share the following keyword:
Fossil find (You may cast this spell only from your graveyard. When this Pokémon dies, exile it.)
like one, immediately after your opponent plays it at instant speed?there are multiple windows to kill it
Any interest in labelling it as Dig or Dig?I changed it a bit:
Sandslash
Pokémon — Ground
: ~ phases out. Activate this ability only if you cast two or more spells this turn.
Whenever ~ phases in, it deals damage equal to it's power to target nonflying Pokémon.
4/4
This way the opponent has more time to react to it. And it fits the flavor better, because it can't attack (regularly) and then still use dig in the same turn cycle.
I believe the defending player must meet all blocking requirements without breaking any blocking restrictions, if able. If the opponent has two creatures (edit: that are able to block), they must block with both. However, if they have only one, they can't block (because of menace), despite the card saying it must be blocked.Does Menace plus "must be blocked if able" force a double block? Ya, right?
That seems like a sweet attacker.
That's my understanding as well, but I wanted to make sure. I think that's a pretty cool combination of effects!I believe the defending player must meet all blocking requirements without breaking any blocking restrictions, if able. If the opponent has two creatures, they must block with both. However, if they have only one, they can't block (because of menace), despite the card saying it must be blocked.
That’s very likely not to do anything since the opponent has to block with two, what will often kill your menace must be blocked creature. First strike/double strike (with deathtouch?) is making it nasty.add deathtouch and trample for some REAL fun
When MPC says, that my "order has successfully entered into our production system and will be complete in 1-2 business days", does that mean I no longer have to worry that they won't print it for (Pokémon) copyright reasons? :o