General Fight Club
- Thread starter Jason Waddell
- Start date
Hi @Shpungo and welcome 
If you want you can use the ci to insert cards more easily and in higher resolution. Here is how you do it:
First you write [
Then you write ci
Then you write ]
Then you write the card name
Then you write [
Then you write /
Then you write ci
Then you write ]
You can also try it just with c instead of ci which will give you the written version instead of the text version. Behold:
Goblin Guide
If you want you can use the ci to insert cards more easily and in higher resolution. Here is how you do it:
First you write [
Then you write ci
Then you write ]
Then you write the card name
Then you write [
Then you write /
Then you write ci
Then you write ]
You can also try it just with c instead of ci which will give you the written version instead of the text version. Behold:
Goblin Guide
Last edited:
Onderzeeboot
Ecstatic Orb
You forgot "Then you write ci" between / and ]Hi @Shpungo and welcome
If you want you can use the ci to insert cards more easily and in higher resolution. Here is how you do it:
...
Then you write /
Then you write ]
By the way, you can also click the card icons at the top of the editor.
You forgot "Then you write ci" between / and ]
By the way, you can also click the card icons at the top of the editor.
Thank you, added
tyvm! I was wondering about how to do that
this can also be a white finisher with early utility if you're in a v low power cube lol or one with a high density of artifacts/enchantments
oh! And I just remembered, another nice card that comes down early as a half The Birth of Meletis and then later in the game flips into an anthem with some free tokens attached. It wants a decent amount of artifacts in the cube though. (idk how to show the flipside?)
this can also be a white finisher with early utility if you're in a v low power cube lol or one with a high density of artifacts/enchantments
oh! And I just remembered, another nice card that comes down early as a half The Birth of Meletis and then later in the game flips into an anthem with some free tokens attached. It wants a decent amount of artifacts in the cube though. (idk how to show the flipside?)
Last edited:
Do they have enough targets or are they often a dead card?
This one’s easy
Step 1: Is your format best of three games or best of one? If best of three, you can for sure include at least one of these. Which one we can decide later. If best of one, then does your format have a high density of important artifact or enchantments? If yes, then you can consider running one. If no, then you cannot. One cannot include a card that is sometimes dead if the wrong opponent is getting paired with you.
Step 2: You have accepted to run one of them for the above reasons. Now we determine which one. Does your cube have one or more decks in green and/or white that care about creating tokens? If yes, then you have to run Growth. If will signal a deck the players can strive for. If no, then you cannot run Growth. You don’t want to signal a deck that isn’t there for the players to assemble.
Step 3: If you have accepted to run one of them and also accepted which one. Then we must decide if you should run both. Does your cube have such a high density of artifact and enchantments while also having a token theme in green and/or white that you can afford to spend two cube slots on Disenchant? If yes, run both. If no, run the one you decided in step 2.
Dom Harvey
Contributor
Sundering Growth is very cool if you have any reasonable number of token makers
I added Sundering Growth to my cube recently but haven't played with it yet. There are a lot of great targets for both effects, so I'm hoping it'll be strong.
You’re going to have to explain this one
I think he means, that growth is just harder to cast for let's say an orzhov deck or a jund deck. It's also much more difficult to splash. For example, you are playing dimir against an opponent with a bunch of good artifacts, you can probably often find a way to splash chant out of your sideboard, but you shouldn't even try to do the same with growth.
Chris Taylor
Contributor
Double hybrid is doable, you wouldn't exclude a ww card from your orzhov deck, and growth doesn't need to cast on t2
Boros reckoner might as well be multicolor though
Boros reckoner might as well be multicolor though
Reckoner can be played in a mono white or mono red deck which is significant
The definition of hybrid
Chris Taylor
Contributor
Eh, Monocolor decks seem like the lamest possible thing to encourage, IMO
Here's silly fight for low power land cyclers:
vs vs
Oliphaunt does have the benefit of cycling for 1, but I do like the ability of drawing cards from lands too
vs vs Oliphaunt does have the benefit of cycling for 1, but I do like the ability of drawing cards from lands too
Well, no, if one can balance mono with multi I applaud that person.
I think you would need a very grindy format for me to want to pick the dino over the elephant. Play pattern wise I like the giant just because haste is fun.
shadowmoor was kino
Thanks man, but it’s not that hard
Most of the time two coloured decks are much stronger than mono-coloured. I think it it quite hard to balance mono vs two (let alone 3 or all).