CML
Contributor
I'll take "horribly worded removal spells" for $1000, Alex.
you know, i didn't find this too hard to parse, but maybe this is just the idiotic SAT tutor mindset
I'll take "horribly worded removal spells" for $1000, Alex.
you know, i didn't find this too hard to parse, but maybe this is just the idiotic SAT tutor mindset
you know, i didn't find this too hard to parse, but maybe this is just the idiotic SAT tutor mindset
When I read this card the first time I was immediately reminded of the logic problems on the LSAT. This card is almost intentionally worded to be hard to understand.
To anyone too lazy to actually watch the video, dead ringers actually does "Destroy two target creatures as long as they are the exact same colors and neither creature is black"
I mean if your cube is promoting mostly 1-2 color decks, 5 mana double doom blade is not horrible...
The worst part about that test was how it had nothing to do with actual law school.
I didn't go, but that is what I heard. And frankly, I can't imagine that type of abstract logic being taught in law school. What purpose would it serve? What jury (or judge for that matter) would understand you?
Is it weird for a mode on a 3-mana card to be Duress?
hahaha look at this dumb custom card, such a bad design
oh wait its real
what the fuck