Thanks for the update! Was already freaking out a bit...
General We Make The Cube
- Thread starter Velrun
- Start date
Aggro could use a hand and Lurrus is super cheeky with replaying cheap artifacts.
@safra
@Rasmus Källqvist
I’m sorry Train but I will ignore this one for now and give you back your two tags.For my first pick, I'm going to replace Wandering Ones with Mausoleum Wanderer...
Mausoleum Wanderer combos much better with Iname as it can sacrifice itself with a relevant ability in order to generate value. It goes really well with Iname!
For my second pick, I'm going to add the rest of a cycle that has already been started. Right now, we have Glassdust Hulk, but it's actually part of a cycle of cycling commons from Alara Reborn.
The rules say you may spend a tag to remove a card. If you want, you may spend a tag to remove Wandering Ones.
Another option was to spend a tag on adding a full cycle of cards. This means you cannot add four cards of a five card cycle. If you want, you can add the whole cycle and we will have double Glassdusk Hulk.
Let me know what you decide.
landofMordor
Administrator
I think you just recognize the power of Wandering Ones.
This one's for @James Stevenson :
...just one, please.
I nominate @XRS and @inscho
Just quoting this so people know I was tagged lolOh, two tags! Manamorphose and Strike it Rich got added already, so I'm happy I don't need to add those now
@TekLazar
We have a lot more artifact glue, but I'll be damned if I don't add
Just turning all of your clue/food/treasure tokens into 2/1's at the beginning of combat is pretty good.
@Zoss
@Brad
I'll add another UB card too, that everyone has to re-read when they realize it can steal artifacts too.
Oh right, tag @Erik Twice
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe but we’re not going to have anymore rules discussions on page 10.
Edit: Train also mad an excellent point. However we are more than 50 % there. The rule might make perfect sense but it’s just a little fun project. It doesn’t have to be perfect. Try to work within the flawed rules instead of creating the perfect rules.
Last edited:
Got tagged twice today!
Let's do:
Do we have any walkers yet? I would've included Hex Parasite if we did, but there's not much for it to interact with, wow.
Tagging @Sheltem @Brad @Zoss @Peter LaCara
Let's do:
Do we have any walkers yet? I would've included Hex Parasite if we did, but there's not much for it to interact with, wow.
Tagging @Sheltem @Brad @Zoss @Peter LaCara
Here's the Rakdos card I had left. As someone else added the first walker, I don't feel bad if I add a second one.
I have another nice artifact to add...
Next: @sigh and @TrainmasterGT
I have another nice artifact to add...
Next: @sigh and @TrainmasterGT
Well this makes me sad.
I just realized we have Vesperlark but not her bigger sister so I’m spending my tag to add
Tagging @Brad and @Alfonzo Bonzo
Tagging @Brad and @Alfonzo Bonzo
I just realized we have Vesperlark but not her bigger sister so I’m spending my tag to add
Tagging @Brad and @Alfonzo Bonzo
@sigh @dbs
Laz
Developer
Ah! I was struggling with 1 card - now I need two?
First up, a card I didn't even know existed - but seems pretty awesome here (though might kill out of no-where - watch this space):
Second, um, oldie but a goodie which works nice with the spell velocity and graveyard themes we have going on here:
Tagging in @Alfonzo Bonzo and @Nemo
First up, a card I didn't even know existed - but seems pretty awesome here (though might kill out of no-where - watch this space):
Second, um, oldie but a goodie which works nice with the spell velocity and graveyard themes we have going on here:
Tagging in @Alfonzo Bonzo and @Nemo
UW is missing a card, right?
I like what you brought with two tags, so @MilesOfficial @MilesOfficial
