Search results

Sure, but so are me and Jason. On the other hand, not all works are created equal when it comes to staring at pages of card images trying to figure out a) what to pick and b) if someone is over your shoulder.

pithing needle imposing sovereign hallowed burial oblivion ring voice of resurgence solemn simulacrum

Well tits. gravecrawler kor sanctifiers student of warfare purphoros, god of the forge sarkhan the mad I'd love the mesa, but I think trying to get a framework for what my deck is doing might be better? Maybe I should be hedging and taking the double land just to avoid getting hated out.

Holy shit yes. Bolt/Dismember/Foundry, for whoever wants to fight me.

If I grab a three, the other player has an option of the other two threes, or the three twos, right?

I'm sort of game? I'm at work so I can't just fire up cockatrice afterwards, but deckbuilding is more interesting than playing anyway?

The core engine is fine. There are, to my knowledge, no gameplay bugs that aren't individual card texts that do weird things (will of the council notwithstanding). The user interface is Hot Garbage. It's always been Hot Garbage, largely because Wizards seems to have a horrible case of Not...

No-one will stop playing, if they were playing on v3 despite it's bullshitness.

Choose your own alternative punchlines, or write your own! R&D is risk averse, unless the card is blue, because blue is the colour of breaking the rules. R&D is risk averse when it comes to giving red anything to do. There's a 'restrictions breed creativity' one, but I can't quite get there...

I reckon something like that will probably get printed soon; probably at 1R because R&D is risk averse except the times it isn't and we get TNN.

Four of them convert into damage in one way or another, which is good for stall-breaking. The black activation is a bit knob, unless you're pestilencing, or something stupid like that.

How much damage would karoos do if you used them instead of guildgates?

If the M14 slivers had been not-slivers, no-one would've minded, especially if slivers hadn't existed beforehand. The fact that they were all 'we're bring this stuff back!' except it wasn't the same stuff was what had everyone up in arms. I still think the mechanical change is for the better...

Also bear in mind that your chosen mechanical identity won't be the only thing the colour's doing. UW is going to be about control for sure, but it'll also have some fatties for finishers, and some small dudes that can do early aggression (via detain) that you can pull over into RWu deck or...

Oh hey, McMillan posted about the process of making those name designer cards here

If your theme is guilds, don't do this. Instead, I'd suggest going ham on including hybrid cards, probably doubling (or more) up on them, as people will snag rakdos cacklers for their boros decks, etc. There's also the whole 'if your theme isn't at common, it's not your theme'. Because I'm a...

Also,

Garriot went to space, McMillan did Binding of Isaac and Super Meat Boy (among other equally grim things), Pardo is head blizzard man, Sirlin wrote Playing to Win and did balance on some iteration of street fighter, Cartwright does Guild Wars skill balance (impressively balanced for the hundreds...

New Ob Nixilis definitely has the 'stop fucking around and play hundred card singleton you idiots' vibe to it to me. The designer cards seem pretty hit and miss; the misses all seem to be trying too hard. Sirlin's is great (the sphinx). Goblin techies is a mess, but hey, diablo 3 lead...

also holy red mythic, batman